Research Article

Last-Mile Shuttle Planning for Improving Bus Commuters’ Travel Time Reliability: A Case Study of Beijing

Table 6

Fitting results of bus arrival intervals.

Departure headwayGaussianWeibullLaplaceLognormalParameters for the best fit

H0 = 1 minR-square0.9040.9150.9420.828a = 0.972
RMSE0.0450.0420.0340.060b = 0.734

H0 = 2 minsR-square0.9360.9340.9730.886a = 1.606
RMSE0.0220.0220.0140.029b = 2.171

H0 = 3 minsR-square0.9020.9040.9620.867a = 2.669
RMSE0.0160.0160.0100.019b = 2.740

H0 = 4 minsR-square0.8790.8770.9690.757a = 3.018
RMSE0.0160.0160.0080.022b = 3.861

H0 = 5 minsR-square0.8880.8700.9680.836a = 2.908
RMSE0.0160.0170.0080.019b = 4.795

H0 = 6 minsR-square0.9120.8790.9890.851a = 2.770
RMSE0.0140.0170.0050.018b = 6.021

H0 = 7 minsR-square0.9170.8830.9890.856a = 2.626
RMSE0.0140.0180.0050.019b = 7.117

H0 = 8 minsR-square0.8980.8620.9890.819a = 3.080
RMSE0.0140.0160.0060.018b = 8.121

H0 = 9 minsR-square0.8590.8190.9760.894a = 2.903
RMSE0.0170.0190.0070.013b = 8.849

H0 = 10 minsR-square0.9170.8900.9870.919a = 3.185
RMSE0.0120.0130.0040.008b = 10.16