Determining the Level of Service Scale of Public Transport System considering the Distribution of Service Quality
Table 2
Comparison of Method 1 and Method 2.
Method
Item
I
II
III
IV
Method 2
Threshold
0 ≤ C < −7.31A +1.28; and 0 ≤ A < 0.175
−7.31A +1.28 ≤ C < −2.13A +1.28; and 0 ≤ A < 0.6
−2.13A +1.28 ≤ C < −1.6A +1.28; and 0 ≤ A < 0.8
−1.6A +1.28 ≤ C; and 0 ≤ A
NS_LOS
51/17/0/0/0/0
1/247/124/16/0/0
0/0/17/45/12/4
1/0/1/12/16/25
NS_TP
32/4/6/26
11/10/20/347
0/13/24/41
2/37/14/2
Method 1
Threshold
0 ≤ A < 0.175
0.175 ≤ A < 0.6
0.6 ≤ A < 0.8
0.8 ≤ A
NS_LOS
134/0/0/0/0/0
0/434/0/0/0/0
0/0/14/0/0/0
0/0/0/7/0/0
NS_TP
45/8/9/72
0/39/51/344
0/10/4/0
0/7/0/0
Note: (1) NT_LOS indicates the number of sample points whose worst LOS of trains is A/B/C/D/E/F, respectively. (2) NS_TP indicates the number of sample points in the beginning and ending periods (5 : 00–6 : 00, 23 : 00–24 : 00)/morning peak (7 : 00–9 : 00)/evening peak (17 : 30–19 : 30)/flat peak (other periods), respectively.
