Optimization of Bus Rerouting to Alleviate the Impact of Rail Transit Construction
Table 7
The relation between the adjustment pattern and the value of .
0.15
0.16
0.17
0.18
0.19
0.2
0.21
0.22
0.23
0.24
0.25
0.26
0.27
0.28
0.29
0.3
Line 3
(min)
13.41
13.93
14.45
14.97
15.49
16.01
16.53
17.05
17.57
No need for adjustment
Adjustment pattern
Migration
Fleet size
12
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
Line 106
(min)
18.89
19.37
19.85
20.33
20.81
21.29
21.77
22.25
22.73
23.21
23.69
24.17
24.65
No need for adjustment
Adjustment pattern
Migration
Fleet size
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
13
13
13
13
13
Line 112
(min)
22.98
23.58
24.18
24.78
25.38
25.98
26.58
27.18
27.78
28.38
No need for adjustment
Adjustment pattern
Stop-skipping
Fleet size
14
14
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
Line 116
(min)
24.67
25.13
25.59
26.05
26.51
26.97
27.43
27.89
28.35
28.81
29.27
29.73
30.19
30.65
31.11
31.57
Adjustment pattern
Migration
Stop-skipping
Fleet size
11
11
11
11
11
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
Before rail construction, the fleet size for the operation of lines 3, 106, 112, 116, is, respectively 12, 10, 12, and 10; during rail construction, if they maintain operation without adjustment, the fleet size will increase to 14, 14, 16, and 12, respectively.
