Research Article
Stacking-Based Ensemble Learning Method for the Recognition of the Pedestrian Crossing Intention
Table 3
Model evaluation result at 0 s before crossing the zebra crossing.
| Algorithm | Accuracy (%) | WSI | WWI | SWI | Pr (%) | Re (%) | F1 (%) | Pr (%) | Re (%) | F1 (%) | Pr (%) | Re (%) | F1 (%) |
| SVM | 90.08 | 88.24 | 89.29 | 88.76 | 89.63 | 89.63 | 89.63 | 92.50 | 91.36 | 91.93 | RF | 92.12 | 90.59 | 91.67 | 91.12 | 92.07 | 92.07 | 92.07 | 93.75 | 92.59 | 93.17 | LSTM | 93.54 | 91.76 | 93.41 | 92.58 | 93.9 | 93.33 | 93.62 | 95.00 | 93.83 | 94.41 | AT-Bi-LSTM | 96.15 | 95.29 | 95.86 | 95.58 | 96.34 | 95.76 | 96.05 | 96.88 | 96.88 | 96.88 | Stacking | 98.79 | 98.24 | 98.82 | 98.53 | 98.78 | 98.78 | 98.78 | 99.38 | 98.76 | 99.07 |
|
|
Note. Pr represents precision, Re represents recall, and F1 represents F1 scores.
|