Research Article

Bayesian Disaggregate and Aggregate Calibration of Path Logit Choice Models

Table 4

Main characteristics and utilities for the five representative users and for all samples.

(a) Attributes
CriteriaMinTimeMaxMotorwayMinCost
Utility per attributeT, yT1,nM, yP1,nL, yL1,nT, yT2,nM, yP2,nT, yT3,nM, yP3,n

User 1031.070.1101.110.581.120.00
User 1021.570.4201.720.712.030.00
User 591.040.7001.140.781.450.00
User 882.700.8202.820.893.730.00
User 875.140.9717.840.00
Average (186 users)2.120.690.372.290.832.990.00

(b) Percentage contribution of the attribute component in the utilities (disaggregate, 186 users)
ID, approach2, C4, B
CriteriaTimeMotorwayCostTimeMotorwayCost
Utility per attributeθT⋅yT1,nθP⋅yP1,nθL⋅yL1,nθT⋅yT2,nθP⋅yP2,nθT⋅yT3,nθP⋅yP3,nθT⋅yT1,nθP⋅yP1,nθL⋅yL1,nθT⋅yT2,nθP⋅yP2,nθT⋅yT3,nθP⋅yP3,n

User 10371%29%0%33%67%100%0%78%22%0%41%59%100%0%
User 10249%51%0%38%62%100%0%57%43%0%47%53%100%0%
User 5927%73%0%27%73%100%0%35%65%0%34%66%100%0%
User 8845%55%0%44%56%100%0%54%46%0%53%47%100%0%
User 8713%9%78%100%0%41%22%37%66%34%100%0%
Average (186 users)13%17%71%41%59%100%0%37%33%30%50%50%100%0%

C = Classic; B = Bayesian; T = travel time (h); M = motorway percentage ([0; 1]); L = label time (0/1); the alternative chosen is reported in bold.