Research Article
Research on Partner Selection of High-Speed Railway Dynamic Logistics Alliance Based on the Dynamic Programming Model
Table 5
Indicator data information of candidate companies [
33].
| ā | Candidate companies | Information technology level/10,000 | Operation efficiency/hour | Logistics service level | Company compatibility | Business performance |
| The first stage | T11 | 10.2 | 5.3 | Excellent | Fair | Relatively good | T12 | 12.5 | 4.2 | Pass | Good | Fair | T13 | 7.9 | 6 | Relatively good | Good | Good | T14 | 10.9 | 4.7 | Fair | Fair | Good |
| The second stage | T21 | 7.3 | 5.3 | Fair | Fair | Relatively good | T22 | 5.8 | 4.2 | Relatively good | Relatively good | Good | T23 | 10.8 | 3.8 | Relatively good | Fair | Fair |
| The third stage | T31 | 12 | 3 | Pass | Relatively good | Fair | T32 | 8 | 5.6 | Relatively good | Fair | Good | T33 | 8.7 | 3 | Excellent | Relatively good | Good | T34 | 7 | 6.5 | Fair | Good | Fair |
|
|