Research Article
Optimization of a Semiflexible Demand-Responsive Feeder System in Suburban Areas Using a Memetic Algorithm
Table 8
Average passenger waiting, in-vehicle, and travel time for 2 or 4 lines.
| ā | TFS solution | MA solution | Improvement | | | p tt | | | p tt | p tt (%) |
| 2 lines | 30% empty stops | 28.1 | 27.7 | 55.8 | 20.3 | 20.7 | 40.9 | 26.60 | 50% empty stops | 28.4 | 27.7 | 56.1 | 20.2 | 19.8 | 40 | 28.60 | 70% empty stops | 28.8 | 27.7 | 56.5 | 18.1 | 19 | 37.1 | 34.30 | Average | 28.4 | 27.7 | 56.1 | 19.5 | 19.8 | 39.4 | 29.80 |
| 3 lines | 30% empty stops | 29.1 | 16.5 | 45.6 | 15.9 | 16.9 | 32.8 | 28.20 | 50% empty stops | 29.4 | 16.5 | 45.9 | 15.7 | 16.6 | 32.4 | 29.50 | 70% empty stops | 30.5 | 16.5 | 47 | 14.7 | 16.4 | 31 | 34.00 | Average | 29.7 | 16.5 | 46.2 | 15.4 | 16.6 | 32.1 | 30.60 |
| 4 lines | 30% empty stops | 28.4 | 15.5 | 44 | 12.9 | 15.8 | 28.7 | 34.70 | 50% empty stops | 29.1 | 15.5 | 44.7 | 12.1 | 15.7 | 27.9 | 37.60 | 70% empty stops | 29.8 | 15.5 | 45.3 | 11.7 | 15.3 | 27 | 40.40 | Average | 29.1 | 15.5 | 44.7 | 12.3 | 15.6 | 27.9 | 37.60 |
|
|