Resilience Evaluation of Ports along the Maritime Silk Road from the Perspective of Investment and Construction

Table 6

Comprehensive resilience evaluation results of ports along the Maritime Silk Road.

Region	Port	The distance D+ from the negative ideal solution Z+	The distance D− from the negative ideal solution Z−	The closeness to the optimal solution CN	Resilience rating
China	Qingdao	0.113463	0.137963	0.548723	C+
	Lianyungang	0.119849	0.132722	0.525484	C+
	Shanghai	0.112312	0.134690	0.545299	C+
	Ningbo Zhoushan	0.106446	0.142506	0.572423	C+
	Shenzhen	0.133228	0.122267	0.478549	C−
	Hong Kong	0.118243	0.128409	0.520608	C+
Southeast Asia	Singapore	0.112676	0.144249	0.561444	C+
	Hai Phong	0.142944	0.113523	0.442641	C−
	Tanjung Priok	0.136780	0.140541	0.506781	C+
	Klang	0.131300	0.115745	0.468519	C−
	Manila	0.163131	0.084367	0.340879	D+
	Laem Chabang	0.150717	0.101580	0.402620	C−
South Asia	Colombo	0.149732	0.096966	0.393057	D+
	Karachi	0.144487	0.113111	0.439101	C−
	Qasim	0.148513	0.105979	0.416435	C−
	Chittagong	0.159652	0.107814	0.403095	C−
	Nehru	0.179145	0.078583	0.304906	D+
Middle East and Africa	Said	0.136000	0.124663	0.478254	C−
	Djibouti	0.156356	0.103883	0.399182	D+
	Abu Dhabi	0.162004	0.099397	0.380247	D+
	Dubai	0.157415	0.101365	0.391704	D+
	Aqaba	0.141753	0.115330	0.448609	C−
	Jeddah	0.148015	0.097262	0.396540	D+
Europe	Piraeus	0.151878	0.105432	0.409748	C−
	Genoa	0.141803	0.109984	0.436813	C−
	Marseille	0.118293	0.150243	0.559489	C+
	Valencia	0.150843	0.103430	0.406767	C−
	Barcelona	0.149011	0.109728	0.424087	C−