Research Article
Assessing the Impacts of Stay-in-Place Policy of COVID-19 Pandemic during the Chinese Spring Festival: A Stated Preference Approach
Table 3
Estimation results of the final model.
| | Estimate | Std. error | values | Estimate | Std. error | .values |
| Panel effect | 1.800611 | 0.104454 | 0.0001 | | | | | COVID-19-care class | Trip-care class | Alternative-specific constant | Conventional railway | 7.997449 | 2.219578 | 0.0003 | 1.092724 | 0.902121 | 0.2258 | High-speed railway | 9.841382 | 2.280200 | 0.0001 | −1.747842 | 1.096703 | 0.1110 | Private car | 4.064016 | 1.955903 | 0.0377 | −0.916661 | 0.746893 | 0.2197 | Stay in place | 0.000000 | | | 0.000000 | | | Alternative-specific attribute | Travel time | Conventional railway | 0.004029 | 0.126532 | 0.9746 | −1.040597 | 0.158513 | 0.0001 | High-speed railway | −0.033325 | 0.231755 | 0.8857 | −0.974192 | 0.317450 | 0.0021 | Private car | 0.212808 | 0.217407 | 0.3277 | −0.463382 | 0.122272 | 0.0002 | Ticket fare | Conventional railway | −0.011552 | 0.005766 | 0.0451 | −0.033681 | 0.007371 | 0.0001 | High-speed railway | −0.004431 | 0.002220 | 0.0459 | −0.011583 | 0.002940 | 0.0001 | Seat class (conventional railway) | Hard berth | 0.039716 | | | 0.533920 | | | Hard seat | 0.002715 | 0.223989 | 0.9903 | −0.156376 | 0.257217 | 0.5432 | Soft berth | 0.357021 | 0.217251 | 0.1003 | 0.402044 | 0.258284 | 0.1196 | Standing-room only | −0.399452 | 0.232867 | 0.0863 | −0.779588 | 0.269298 | 0.0038 | Seat class (high-speed railway) | | | | | | | First class | −0.291001 | | | 0.576797 | | | Second class | 1.057980 | 0.240335 | 0.0001 | 0.073848 | 0.270726 | 0.7850 | Business class | 0.248026 | 0.208970 | 0.2353 | 0.110066 | 0.258180 | 0.6699 | Standing-room only | −1.015005 | 0.214643 | 0.0001 | −0.760711 | 0.296179 | 0.0102 | Context attribute | Subsidy | 0.001376 | 0.000551 | 0.0126 | 0.000133 | 0.000113 | 0.2412 | Confirmed cases in hometown | | | | | | | Yes | −0.627689 | | | 0.421307 | | | No | 0.627689 | 0.643440 | 0.3293 | −0.421307 | 0.134650 | 0.0018 | Quarantine policy in hometown | | | | | | | No quarantine policies | −5.013357 | | | −0.236481 | | | No quarantine needed with valid negative test reports | −0.639765 | 1.345637 | 0.6345 | 0.021119 | 0.179377 | 0.9063 | Home quarantine for 14 days | 2.156989 | 1.026747 | 0.0357 | 0.237127 | 0.177920 | 0.1826 | Quarantined in hotels for 14 days | 3.496133 | 1.066590 | 0.0010 | −0.021765 | 0.196350 | 0.9117 | Decisions from social networks | | | | | | | All stay in place | 2.631740 | | | −0.138801 | | | Most stay in place | 0.819895 | 0.763138 | 0.2827 | 0.260562 | 0.177990 | 0.1432 | A few stay in place | −1.883353 | 0.681702 | 0.0057 | 0.042470 | 0.173286 | 0.8064 | None stay in place | −1.568282 | 0.748591 | 0.0362 | −0.164231 | 0.177038 | 0.3536 | Std. deviation of error component between conventional and high-speed railway | 3.228615 | 1.001238 | 0.0013 | 6.322326 | 1.018145 | 0.0001 | Latent class membership | | | | | | | Age | | | | | | | Above 40 | | | | 0.563990 | | | 31∼40 | | | | 0.490777 | 0.126844 | 0.0001 | 25∼30 | | | | −0.364855 | 0.111166 | 0.0010 | Lower than 25 | | | | −0.689912 | 0.146704 | 0.0001 | Marital status | Single | | | | 0.447999 | | | Married (with kids) | | | | −0.232936 | 0.093271 | 0.0125 | Married (no kids) | | | | −0.215063 | 0.100966 | 0.0332 | Constant | | | | 0.943526 | 0.110246 | 0.0001 | No. of observations | 4544 | No. of respondents | 568 | No. of scrambled Halton draws | 100 | Initial loglikelihood | −6299.322 | Final loglikelihood | −4310.362 | Rho-squared | 0.3157 | Adj. Rho-squared | 0.3070 |
|
|
value <0.01; value <0.05; value <0.1. |