Research Article
Assessing the Impacts of Stay-in-Place Policy of COVID-19 Pandemic during the Chinese Spring Festival: A Stated Preference Approach
Table 5
Policy analysis based on the final model.
| | Conventional railway (%) | High-speed railway (%) | Private car (%) | Stay in place (%) |
| Subsidy for staying in place | −0.17 | −0.32 | −0.18 | 0.67 | Ticket fare for conventional railway | −0.93 | 0.52 | 0.08 | 0.33 | Ticket fare for high-speed railway | 0.54 | −1.05 | 0.12 | 0.39 | Ticket fare for conventional and high-speed railways | −0.41 | −0.53 | 0.19 | 0.75 | Decisions from social networks | All stay in place | −0.83 | −2.05 | −0.54 | 3.42 | Most stay in place | −0.60 | −0.94 | −0.91 | 2.45 | A few stay in place | 0.38 | 0.88 | 0.41 | −1.67 | None stay in place | 0.59 | 1.04 | 0.89 | −2.52 | Quarantine policy in hometown | No quarantine policies | 0.86 | 1.47 | 1.48 | −3.81 | No quarantine needed with valid negative test reports | 0.11 | 0.27 | 0.14 | −0.52 | Home quarantine for 14 days | −1.03 | −1.90 | −1.39 | 4.32 | Quarantined in hotels for 14 days | −1.35 | −2.96 | −1.33 | 5.64 |
|
|