Abstract

A new ruthenium complex, Ru(bpbp)(pbb)Cl, based on 2,6-bis(1-(phenyl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)pyridine (bpbp) and 2-(1-phenyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)benzoate (pbb) was synthesized. The complex Ru(bpbp)(pbb)Cl could catalytically oxidize 1-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)ethanol to 1-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)ethanone with H2O2 as oxidant. Influence of temperature and catalyst amount on the oxidation reaction was evaluated. The reaction optimal conditions are as follows: molar ratio of catalyst to substrate to H2O2 is 1 : 1000 : 3000, the proper reaction temperature is 50°C and reaction time lasts 5 h, and the isolated yield of 1-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)ethanol to 1-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)ethanone under the optimal reaction conditions is 57%.

1. Introduction

Benzimidazole is one of the oldest known nitrogen heterocycles and was first synthesized by Hoebrecker. The properties of benzimidazole and its derivatives have been studied over more than one hundred years. Benzimidazole derivatives are useful intermediates/subunits for the development of molecules of pharmaceutical or biological interest [18]; acetyl group contains carbonyl group and α-H group, which can take part in many reactions; thus 1-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)ethanone is a key intermediate for preparation of complicate benzimidazole-based compounds. Oxidation of 1-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)ethanol to 1-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)ethanone is of great importance for precursors of a variety of valuable fine chemicals. Traditionally, 1-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)ethanone is produced by solid phase oxidation of (1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)methanol with KMnO4/Al2O3 or oxidized by dichromates salt [912]. In these traditional oxidation processes, large amounts of toxic, volatile organic solvents and metal oxidants were extensively used and it is difficult to magnify the quantity of product. Hence, developing green selective oxidation process of (1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)ethanol is still a challenging task in catalysis. Hydrogen peroxide is an environmentally benign oxidant, which theoretically generates only water as a by-product. The discovery of new catalyst employing H2O2 as oxidant is gathering much attention [1316]. Ruthenium complex constitutes a versatile class of catalysts for important synthetic transformations in organic chemistry [17]. Benzimidazole is more easily synthesized than imidazole; we continued to focus on the synthesis and applications of complexes based on benzimidazole compound [1821]. In recent years, we turned our attention to catalytic oxidation properties of ruthenium complex based on benzimidazole group ligand [22, 23]. Herein, we synthesized a new benzimidazole-based ligand and its ruthenium complex to investigate its catalytic oxidation properties of (1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)ethanol to 1-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)ethanone with H2O2 as oxidant. Our results suggested that ruthenium complex based on 2,6-bis(1-(phenyl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)pyridine (bpbp) and 2-(1-phenyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)benzoic acid (pbba) could catalytically oxidize 1-(1H-benzod}imidazol-2-yl)ethanol toward 1-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)ethanone with H2O2 as oxidant.

2. Experimental

2.1. Reagents and Methods

Chemicals were of analytical grade and purchased from J&K Company without further purification unless indicated. 2-(Chlorocarbonyl)benzoic acid was synthesized according to literature [24]. Mass spectra were obtained on a Shimadzu LCMS-2010A. Elemental analyses were carried out with an Elementar vario EL elemental analyzer. 1HNMR was recorded on a Bruker AVANCE 400 spectrometer (400 MHz). Chemical shifts are given in ppm and refer to the residual solvent as the internal standard. IR spectra were recorded on a Bruker 550 FT-IR spectrometer.

2.2. Synthesis of 2-((2-(Phenylamino)phenyl)carbamoyl)benzoic Acid

N1-phenylbenzene-1, 2-diamine (7.36 g, 40 mmol), and triethylamine (10 mL) in 100 mL of CH2Cl2 were added to the solution of 2-(Chlorocarbonyl)benzoic acid (7.38 g, 40 mmol) in 100 mL of CH2Cl2. The mixture was further stirred for 2 h at ambient temperature. The light yellow solid was collected by filtration, washed with water, and dried in vacuo (yield: 8.10 g, 61.0%). Analysis calculated for C20H16N2O3 (%), C, 72.28%, H, 4.85%, N, 8.43%, Found: C, 72.32%, H, 4.74%, N, 8.40%. IR (KBr)/cm−1, 3390, 3052, 1781, 1706, 1597, 1508, 1419, 1385, 1290, 1247, 1178, 1109, 1079, 884, 748, 717, 694, 629, 530. 1HNMR (400 MHz, -DMSO ppm): 6.83–6.87 (t, 1H), 6.91–6.96 (m, 1H), 7.01–7.03 (d, 2H), 7.19–7.23 (t, 2H), 7.27–7.32 (q, 3H), 7.87–7.94 (m, 4H).

2.3. Synthesis of 2-(1-Phenyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)benzoic Acid (pbba)

2-(1-Phenyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)benzoic acid was synthesized according to the reference method [25]. 2-((2-(Phenylamino)phenyl)carbamoyl)benzoic acid (6.65 g, 20 mmol) was heated at 250°C for 3 h under nitrogen. After cooling, water (50 mL) was added to the mixture and extracted with CH2Cl2 (50 × 3 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with water. Solvent of the filtrate was removed in vacuo to obtain a crude solid. White 2-(1-phenyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)benzoic acid was purified by recrystallization from ethanol (2.83 g, 45%). Analysis calculated for C20H14N2O2 (%), C, 76.42%, H, 4.49%, N, 8.91%. Found: C, 76.32%, H, 4.44%, N, 8.84%. IR (KBr)/cm−1, 3436, 3064, 2922, 2439, 1689, 1593, 1498, 1449, 1140, 1246, 1140, 1075, 1002, 913, 763, 695. 1HNMR (400 MHz, -DMSO, ppm): 7.21–7.60 (m, 11H), 7.74–7.77 (d, 1H), 7.81–7.83 (d, 1H).

2.4. Synthesis of N2, N6-bis(2-(phenylamino)phenyl)pyridine-2,6-dicarboxamide

Pyridine-2, 6-dicarboxylic acid (3.34 g, 20 mmol) was refluxed in thionyl chloride 20 mL for 8 h. Excess thionyl chloride was removed under vacuum. After cooling to room temperature, N1-phenylbenzene-1,2-diamine (7.36 g, 40 mmol) and triethylamine (10 mL) in 60 mL of CH2C12, were added to the solution of the residue in CH2C12 (30 mL). The mixture was further stirred for 2 h at ambient temperature. The yellow solid was collected by filtration, washed with water, and dried in vacuo (yield: 5.31 g, 53.00%). Analysis calculated for C31H25N5O2 (%), C, 74.53%, H, 5.04%, N, 14.02%. Found: C, 74.52%, H, 5.14%, N, 14.20%. IR (KBr)/cm−1, 3353, 3046, 1676, 1641, 1595, 1516, 1456, 1425, 1310, 1260, 1176, 1150, 1076, 999, 882, 745, 676, 493. 1HNMR (400 MHz, -DMSO, ): 6.74–6.77 (t, 2H), 6.89–6.91 (d, 4H), 7.02–7.09 (t, 2H), 7.10–7.13 (t, 4H), 7.20–7.24 (t, 2H), 7.34–7.36 (d, 2H), 7.50–7.57 (t, 4H) 8.25–8.28 (q, 1H), 8.33–8.35 (d, 2H).

2.5. Synthesis of 2, 6-Bis(1-(phenyl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)pyridine (bpbp)

, -bis(2-(phenylamino)phenyl)pyridine-2,6-dicarboxamide (5.00 g, 10 mmol) was heated at 250°C for 3 h under nitrogen. After cooling, water (50 mL) was added to the mixture and extracted with CH2Cl2 (50 × 3 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with water. Solvent of the filtrate was removed in vacuo to obtain a crude solid. White 2, 6-bis(1-(phenyl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)pyridine was purified by recrystallization from ethanol. (yield: 2.25 g, 48.59%) Analysis calculated for C31H21N5 (%), C, 80.32%, H, 4.57%, N, 15.11%. Found: C, 80.42%, H, 4.44%, N, 15.20%. IR (KBr)/cm−1, 3435, 3059, 1525, 1500, 1405, 1330, 1258, 1198, 1158, 1138, 1076, 1004, 823, 745, 695, 639. 1HNMR (400 MHz, -DMSO, ppm): 7.01–7.07 (m, 4H), 7.17–7.43 (m, 12H), 7.68–7.97 (m, 3H), 8.31–8.38 (m, 2H).

2.6. Synthesis of Ruthenium Complex Ru(bpbp)Cl3

bpbp (1.389 g, 0.3 mmol) and RuCl3·nH2O (1.04 g, 0.31 mmol) were dissolved in ethanol (100 mL); the reaction mixture was refluxed for 4 h at 80°C to form a red brown deposition and then was filtered after cooling to room temperature. The brown red solid was obtained after washing by water (yield: 1.42 g, 71.0%) Analysis calculated for C31H21N5Cl3Ru (%), C, 75.49%, H, 3.15%, N, 15.85%. Found: C, 75.51%, H, 3.14%, N, 15.72%. IR (KBr)/cm−1, 3456, 3060, 1592, 1506, 1406, 1337, 1270, 1190, 1148, 1007, 1004, 892, 832, 757, 698, 650, 611. 1HNMR (400 MHz, -DMSO, ppm): 6.97–7.44 (m, 12H), 7.67–7.83 (m, 4H), 7.89–7.97 (m, 3H), 8.32–8.38 (m, 2H).

2.7. Synthesis of Ruthenium Complex Ru(bpbp)(pbb)Cl

NaOH (0.04 g, 1 mmol), 2-(1-phenyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)benzoic acid (0.314 g, 1 mmol) was dissolved in ethanol (50 mL) and water (10 mL) was added to Ru(bpbp)Cl3 (0.667 g, 1 mmol). The whole reaction mixture was again refluxed at 80°C for 4 h to result in violet solution. The solvent was reduced to 10 mL after reaction for 3 h. After filtering, the dark violet precipitate was collected (0.515 g, yield: 56.40%). Calc. for C51H34N7O2ClRu: C, 67.06%; H, 3.75%; N, 10.73%. Found: C, 67.41%; H, 3.79%; N, 10.35%; IR (KBr)/cm−1, 3417, 3058, 1592, 1450, 1380, 1332, 1249, 1151, 1078, 1013, 821, 748, 698, 646, 507. 1HNMR (400 MHz, -DMSO, ppm): 6.96–7.43 (m, 28H), 7.60–7.84 (m, 3H), 7.84–8.32 (m, 3H).

2.8. X-Ray Crystallography

Single crystal structure determination was performed on a Siemens Smart-CCD diffractometer equipped with a normal focus, 3 kW sealed tube X-ray source, and graphite monochromated Mo-Kα radiation ( = 0.71073 Å) at 173 K. The structure was solved by direct method and refined by program SHELXTL and absorption was adopted by semiempirical method. All nonhydrogen atoms in both structures were refined anisotropic displacement parameters. All hydrogen atoms were theoretically added. Crystallographic data for the structural analysis have been deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, CCDC number 1509858. Copies of this information may be obtained from The Director, CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge, CB2 1EZ, UK (https://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk). The crystal data are summarized in Table 1.

2.9. Catalytic Oxidation of (1H-Benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)ethanol

The catalytic oxidation of (1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)ethanol was carried out in a magnetically stirred glass reaction tube fitted with a reflux condenser. A typical procedure was as follows: (1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)ethanol aqueous solution (0.1 mol/L), ruthenium complex catalyst (1 × 10−4 mmol, 0.01 mol% based substrate), and 0.2 mmol (inert internal standard) were added into a reaction tube. The reactor containing this mixture was heated to proper temperature in an oil bath under vigorous stirring, and then the aqueous hydroperoxide (30% H2O2, 10 mol/L) was slowly dropped in. The product samples were drawn at regular time intervals and analyzed by GC and GC-MS. GC analyses were performed on a Shimadzu GC-2010 plus chromatography equipped with Rtx-5 capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm). GC-MS analyses were recorded on a Shimadzu GCMS-QP2010 equipped with Rxi-5 ms capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Synthesis of 2-(1-Phenyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)benzoic Acid, 2,6-Bis(1-phenyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)pyridine, and the Ruthenium Complex

The synthetic route of 2-(1-phenyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)benzoic acid (pbba), 2,6-bis(1-phenyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)pyridine (bpbp), and ruthenium complex (Ru (bpbp)(pbb)Cl was shown in Figure 1. 2-(1-Phenyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)benzoic acid (pbba) and 2,6-bis(1-phenyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)pyridine (bpbp) ligand are, respectively, prepared by intramolecular thermocyclization condensation of 2-((2-(phenylamino)phenyl)carbamoyl)benzoic acid or N2,N6-bis(2-(phenylamino)phenyl)pyridine-2,6-dicarboxamide. The crystals of 2-(1-phenyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)benzoic acid (pbba) and 2,6-bis(1-phenyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)pyridine (bpbp) are all obtained by recrystallization from ethanol. The preparation of the ruthenium complex was through two steps. First, the bpbp ligand reacts with RuCl3 to result in red brown deposition Ru(bpbp)Cl3; then sodium 2-(1-phenyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)benzoate substitutes the two Cl ions to form violet Ru(bpbp)(pbb)Cl solution; crude violet solid ruthenium complex could be obtained after evaporation of alcohol. Pure ruthenium complex was obtained from recrystallization from alcohol.

3.2. Structure Analytical of 2-(1-Phenyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)benzoic Acid, 2,6-Bis(1-phenyl-1-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)pyridine, and the Ruthenium Complex

The structures of 2-(1-phenyl-1H-benzo[]imidazol-2-yl)benzoic acid (pbba) and 2,6-bis(1-(phenyl)-1H-benzo[]imidazol-2-yl)pyridine (bpbp) are shown in Figure 2. The crystal structure of 2, 6-bis(1-(phenyl)-1H-benzo[]imidazol-2-yl)pyridine has been reported [21]. Selected bond lengths and angles for 2-(1-phenyl-1H-benzo[]imidazol-2-yl)benzoic acidare listed in Table 2. All the C-N bond and angles of 2-(1-phenyl-1H-benzo[]imidazol-2-yl)benzoic acid are within normal range. The two phenyl rings are not coplanar with the benzimidazole ring. The dihedral angle between phenyl ring (C7 to C12) and benzimidazole is 63.3° and between the phenyl ring (C15 to C19) and benzimidazole is 76.7°. The COOH is coplanar with the phenyl ring (C15 to C19). The pack diagram of molecule is shown in Figure 3. The hydrogen bond O2-HN1 (2.707 Å) links the molecules to form 1D chain along with the axis. The ruthenium complex, Ru(bpbp)(pbb)Cl, was characterized by element analysis and IR. The measurements of C, H, and N element analysis are in good agreement with the theory calculated values. The appearance of 1592 and 1450 cm−1 in the ruthenium complex Ru(bpbp)(pbb)Cl shows deprotonation to coordination to Ru2+ ion.

3.3. Catalytical Oxidation Property of (1H-Benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)ethanol to 1-(1H-Benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)ethanone

In order to explore preparation method of 1-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)ethanone, we focus our attention on the oxidation reaction of (1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)ethanol (Figure 4), by employing ruthenium complex, Ru(bpbp)(pbb)Cl as catalyst, and hydrogen peroxide as oxidant. The effect of reaction parameters was examined in water solvent, as listed in Table 3. Only 35% yield of 1-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)ethanone was obtained when the reaction was conducted at 30°C, while the selectivity would become poor as further rising the temperature to 80°C (entries 1, 2, and 3). Therefore, the optimized temperature was proved to be 50°C. The yield of 1-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)ethanone increased with increasing the molar ratio of H2O2/(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)ethanol (entries 2, 4, 5). The large excess amount of H2O2 could promote overoxidaiton of (1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)ethanol, which resulted in the slight decreasing of selectivity toward 1-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)ethanone (entry 6). The reaction almost did not occur in the absence of catalyst (entry 7). Similarly, the yield of 1-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)ethanone increased with the rising amount of catalyst. And the excess amount of catalyst caused decrease of selectivity to 1-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)ethanone (entry 8, 9).

The procedure for gram scale oxidation of (1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)ethanol to 1-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)ethanone was performed as follows: (1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)ethanol (0.1 mol, 14.8 g) and Ru(bpbp)(pbb)Cl (0.001 mmol, 7.32 × 10−3 g) were added into a reactor. The reactor containing this mixture was heated to 50°C in an oil bath under vigorous stirring, and then 30% H2O2 (30 mL, 0.3 mol) was slowly dropped into the reactor in 30 min. The mixture was stirred for 5 h. After filter, the solution was evaporated under reduced pressure at 50°C. After extraction with CH2Cl2, the crude product was chromatographed on silica gel (eluent: CH2Cl2). Pure 1-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)ethanone (0.07 mmol, 10.2 g) was obtained with the isolated yield of 57% by removing the solvent. The product was identified by 1HNMR spectrum (400 MHz, CDCl3) (Figure 5) and IR spectrum (Figure 6), which are all in agreement with the assumed structure. IR is also same with the standard Bio-Rad/Sadtler IR Data.

4. Conclusion

In conclusion, a new ruthenium complex, Ru(bpbp)(pbb)Cl, was exploited for the oxidation of (1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)ethanol to 1-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)ethanone with H2O2 as oxidant. The reaction optimal conditions are as follows: molar ratio of catalyst to substrate to H2O2 is 1 : 1000 : 3000, the proper reaction temperature is 50°C and reaction time last 5 h, and the isolated yield of 1-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)ethanol to 1-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)ethanone under the optimal reaction conditions is 57%.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (no. 2014A030307010), Special Funds for Public Welfare Research and Capacity Building in Guangdong Province (nos. 2015A010105031 and 2016A010103042), the National Spark Program Project (no. 2015GA780033), and Lingnan Normal University Science Research Foundation (no. LZL1504).