Angry Apps: The Impact of Network Timer Selection on Power Consumption, Signalling Load, and Web QoE

<table class="table-group" width="800px"><tr class="fig-image" id="a"><td><img alt="176217.fig.007a" src="https://static-preview.hindawi.com/articles/jcnc/volume-2013/176217/figures/176217.fig.007a.jpg"/></td></tr><tr class="fig-caption"><td align="center"><table><tr><td><b>(a) </b>Results of the optimisation on target application Angry Birds</td></tr></table></td></tr><tr class="fig-image" id="b"><td><img alt="176217.fig.007b" src="https://static-preview.hindawi.com/articles/jcnc/volume-2013/176217/figures/176217.fig.007b.jpg"/></td></tr><tr class="fig-caption"><td align="center"><table><tr><td><b>(b) </b>Influence of the optimisation for Angry Birds on Aupeo</td></tr></table></td></tr></table>

<table>Influence of manipulating <svg height="15.875" id="M70" style="vertical-align:-3.41931pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 38.049999 15.875" width="38.049999" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,11.55)"><path d="M649 676l-22 -187l-33 -2q3 56 -12 94q-8 20 -31.5 26.5t-86.5 6.5h-74l-90 -491q-4 -23 -6 -36.5t1 -25t7 -16.5t18 -9t27 -5t41 -3l-6 -28h-286l4 28q68 5 84 18.5t28 76.5l94 491h-55q-74 0 -100.5 -6t-41.5 -23q-24 -29 -54 -98l-32 1q32 98 53 188h22q7 -18 15 -22
t37 -4h417q23 0 33.5 5t25.5 21h23z" id="x1D447"></path></g>
<g transform="matrix(.012,-0,0,-.012,11.388,15.637)"><path d="M43 650h280q194 0 282 -85q85 -82 85 -215q0 -173 -123 -267q-107 -83 -297 -83h-236v27q65 5 79.5 19.5t14.5 77.5v402q0 45 -6 62.5t-21.5 24t-57.5 9.5v28zM213 547v-416q0 -55 24.5 -75t81.5 -20q133 0 203 86t70 214q0 80 -30 143t-88 97q-66 41 -170 41
q-62 0 -78 -13q-13 -9 -13 -57z" id="x44"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.012,-0,0,-.012,20.335,15.637)"><path d="M614 175l29 -10q-33 -109 -57 -154q-121 -26 -184 -26q-90 0 -160.5 29t-112.5 77t-63.5 105.5t-21.5 119.5q0 157 108 253t277 96q36 0 71.5 -5t69 -13.5t36.5 -8.5q15 -102 20 -150l-29 -8q-20 79 -66.5 114t-128.5 35q-119 0 -187.5 -86t-68.5 -207
q0 -140 73.5 -227.5t188.5 -87.5q73 0 119.5 37.5t86.5 116.5z" id="x43"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.012,-0,0,-.012,28.248,15.637)"><path d="M729 650v-28q-62 -5 -76 -19.5t-14 -75.5v-404q0 -62 13.5 -76t75.5 -19v-28h-268v28q65 5 79.5 19t14.5 76v199h-341v-199q0 -62 14 -76t76 -19v-28h-263v28q61 5 74.5 19t13.5 76v404q0 62 -14 76t-76 19v28h259v-28q-58 -5 -71 -19t-13 -76v-162h341v162
q0 61 -13.5 75.5t-72.5 19.5v28h261z" id="x48"></path></g>
</svg> timer on different applications.</table>

Journal of Computer Networks and Communications

fig7

Figure 7

Figure 7: Angry Apps: The Impact of Network Timer Selection on Power Consumption, Signalling Load, and Web QoE 