Review Article

SMAC-Based WSN Protocol-Current State of the Art, Challenges, and Future Directions

Table 2

Comparative study of SLDC MAC protocols.

ReferenceProblem identifiedProposed solutionLimitation

Lin et al. [156]Sleep delays, fixed duty cycleSMAC with dynamic duty cycle (DSMAC)Increased overhead
[157]DelaySMAC with adaptive listeningLong end-to-end delay
[158]Data forwarding interruption problem, latency, and fixed duty cycle of LDC-MAC protocolsEnergy-efficient and low latency MAC (DMAC) protocols are proposed.Increased overhead alongside traffic load and network topology limited to tree-based topology
[159]Latency in multihop forwarding, end-to-end delivery latency, poor traffic contention controlRouting enhanced MAC (R-MAC) protocolCollisions due to two hidden terminals
Ray et al. [66]Idle listening, energy wastage in T-MACAdvertisement MAC (ADV-MAC)Increased overheads
[160]High energy dissipation of sensor nodes as a result of random movements, as well as the use of RSSI in predicting mobility in mobility-aware SMAC (MS-MAC)Energy-efficient mobility-aware SMAC (EMS-MAC) protocolLimited mobility zones, high mobility failures
[161]Energy dissipation in idle listeningImproved T-MAC with power saver modeIncreased overhead
[162]Energy dissipation, fixed duty cycle, queuing delayEnergy-efficient and QoS-aware (EEQ)Homogeneous scenarios, symmetric radio channel