Research Article
The Kansei Design Characteristics towards Learning Style
Table 10
Correlation between cognitive alert styles and students characteristics (spectacles users).
| (a) |
| | | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | Q6 | Q7 | Q8 | Q9 |
| | Gender | | | | | | 0.250* | | | | | Power | | | | | | | | | | | Use | | | | | | | 0.265** | | | | Lens | | | | | | | | | | | First time | | | | | | | 0.198* | | | | Last time | | | | | | | | | | | Quantity spec | | 0.265** | | | | | −0.247* | | | | Sunglass | 0.286** | −0.197* | | | −0.240* | | | | | | First preference | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| (b) |
| | Cognitive alert style—Q7 | Before elementary school | Elementary school | High school | University | Total |
| | I change the way I do for variety | 7 | 20 | 26 | 2 | 55 | | When one way works well, I don’t change it | 4 | 10 | 25 | 6 | 45 |
| | Total | 11 | 30 | 51 | 8 | 100 |
|
|
| (c) |
| | Cognitive alert style —Q7 | Yes | No | Total |
| | I change the way I do for variety | 46 | 9 | 55 | | When one way works well, I don’t change it | 27 | 18 | 45 |
| | Total | 73 | 27 | 100 |
|
|
| (d) |
| | Having spectacle | Freq |
| | 1 | 54 | | 2 | 26 | | 3 | 20 |
| | Having sunglass | 34 |
|
|
Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2 tailed). Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2 tailed).
|