Research Article
Intelligent Process of Spectrum Handoff/Mobility in Cognitive Radio Networks
Table 1
Comparison of spectrum handoff techniques.
| | Techniques | Strong point | Weak point | Handoff latency | Principal characteristics |
| | Pure proactive handoff | (i) Predicts the arrival of PU on the channel | (i) Obsolete target channel selection | Very weak handoff time | (i) Appropriate for large detection data | | (ii) Fastest response collision rate reduction | (ii) Exploitable in a well-modeled PU network | | (ii) Poor PU traffic detection leads to poor handoff results |
| | Pure reactive handoff | (i) Target channel selected accurately | Slow response | Medium handoff time | (i) Appropriate for short detection time data | | (ii) Exploitable for normal CRNs |
| | Hybrid handoff | (i) Fastest response | (i) Selection of the obsolete target channel | Very weak handoff time | (i) Appropriate for short detection time data | | (ii) Intelligent target selection | (ii) Poor proactive spectrum detection results in poor spectrum handoff |
| | Nonhandoff schemes | (i) Very low interference level of PU | Very high interference level of SU | Incredibly high latency | ā |
|
|