Research Article

Handover between Vehicular Network Providers Using Bioinspired Attractor Selection Technique

Table 6

Network handover ranking map as a function of both threshold and sensitivity.

Rank 1: highest stability, rank 4: lowest stability
ThresholdSensitivityHandover networksSelection probability
S lNet 1Net 2Net 3Net 4λ

00{1, 2}{3, 1}{4, 4}{2, 3}{1.0, 0.0625}
11{1, 1}{3, 4}{2, 2}{4, 3}{0.9999, 0.5243}
22{2, 2}{3, 4}{1, 1}{3, 3}{0.9992, 0.8841}
33{2, 2}{3, 3}{4, 4}{1, 1}{0.9946, 0.9979}
44{2, 2}{3, 4}{1, 1}{4, 3}{0.9776, 0.9959}
55{4, 4}{1, 1}{3, 3}{2, 2}{0.9345, 0.9992}
66{3, 3}{2, 2}{1, 1}{4, 4}{0.8471, 0.9998}
77{1, 1}{2, 2}{4, 3}{3, 4}{0.7087, 0.9999}
88{1, 1}{2, 2}{4, 4}{3, 3}{0.5291, 0.9999}
99{1, 3}{4, 4}{3, 1}{2, 2}{0.3482, 0.9999}
1010{1, 2}{4, 4}{3, 3}{2, 1}{0.2002, 0.9999}