Research Article
Access to Functional Handwashing Facilities and Associated Factors among South Sudanese Refugees in Rhino Camp Settlement, Northwestern Uganda
Table 2
Water sources and access to handwashing facilities.
| Variable | Category | Number of participants | Summary measure |
| Access improved water source | Yes | 312 | 100.0% |
| Types of water sources | Public tap stands | 205 | 65.7% | Boreholes | 104 | 33.3% | Private tap stands | 3 | 1.0% |
| Handwashing facility present | No | 189 | 60.6% | Yes | 123 | 39.4% |
| Type of handwashing facility | Tippy taps | 104 | 84.6% | Oxfam buckets | 9 | 7.3% | Handwashing bags | 9 | 7.3% | Bush proof handwashing containers | 1 | 0.8% |
| Household uses soap | No | 39 | 12.5% | Yes | 273 | 87.5% |
| Soap available for handwashing at critical times | No | 120 | 44.0% | Yes | 153 | 56.0% |
| Reasons for unavailability of soap at handwashing stations | High cost of soap | 83 | 69.1% | Lack of soap in the house | 58 | 48.3% | Use ash instead of soap | 79 | 65.8% |
| Handwashing facility has soap and water | No | 240 | 76.9% | Yes | 72 | 23.1% |
| Household received home-based health education on hand hygiene in the last 6 months | No | 45 | 14.4% | Yes | 267 | 85.6% |
|
|
|