Emergency Decision-making Method of Unconventional Emergencies in Higher Education Based on Intensive Learning

Table 3

Calculation results of emergency decision parameters for unconventional emergencies in higher education.

Ability requirement	Importance of demand	Target value	Improvement ratio/%
Counselors found the accident at the first time.	0.38	0.64	91.47
Personnel are sent to hospital for rescue in time.	0.22	0.90	18.31
Protection of the scene is complete.	0.56	0.96	65.72
Accident information is reported in time.	0.64	0.16	69.70
Relevant information of the deceased is collected comprehensively.	0.57	0.86	92.48
Prevent information diffusion	0.35	0.00	24.26
Accurate event characterization	0.27	0.87	3.19
Emergency plan starts quickly.	0.40	0.96	68.58
Effective leadership decision-making	0.35	0.86	10.43
Reasonable allocation of emergency resources	0.62	0.11	18.22
Family reception in place	0.05	0.29	8.35
Network public opinion guidance	0.91	0.14	12.90
Prevent mass incidents	0.46	0.33	68.15
Prevent derivative events	0.60	0.58	10.16
Low social influence	0.22	0.59	11.16
Authoritative information release	0.43	0.39	0.69
Information transmission is smooth.	0.54	0.98	56.26
End the accident as soon as possible.	0.72	0.96	7.90
Reasonable compensation or assistance compensation to family members	0.89	0.74	89.98
Restore normal teaching order on campus on time.	0.92	0.98	99.90
Timely psychological intervention for students.	0.17	0.90	29.69