|
| Goal | Criteria | Evaluation factor | Project |
|
| Well-facilitated farmland project construction performance | Decision | Project establishment | Degree of project necessity (points) |
| Degree of procedural compliance (points) |
| Performance appraisal | Degree of fitness for performance objectives (points) |
| Degree of project necessity (points) |
| Capital inputs | Capital availability rate (%) |
| Unit area investment amount (yuan/hm−2) |
| Process | Construction specifications | Task completion rate (%) |
| The soundness of management system (points) |
| Project quality | Clarity of quality standards (points) |
| Effectiveness of control measures (points) |
| Financial monitoring | Deviation rate of fund expenditure (%) |
| Normality of expenditure (points) |
| Output | Construction effectiveness | Completion rate of well-facilitated farmland (%) |
| Project quality | Road accessibility rate (%) |
| Economic benefits | Irrigation coverage rate (%) |
| Ecological benefits | Land leveling rate (%) |
| Social benefits | Acceptance pass rate (%) |
| Benefit | Construction effectiveness | Increase in grain production per mu (kg·hm−2) |
| Project quality | Increase in annual income per capita (yuan·hm−2) |
| Economic benefits | Water-saving rate of the project (%) |
| Ecological benefits | Degree of ecological improvement (points) |
| Social benefits | Public satisfaction (%) |
| Beneficiaries’ compliance rate (%) |
|
