|
| Goal | Criteria | Evaluation factor | Project | Weight (%) |
|
| Well-facilitated farmland project construction performance | Decision (10.8%) | Project establishment (15.4%) | Degree of project necessity (points) | 0.9 |
| Degree of procedural compliance (points) | 0.7 |
| Performance appraisal (33.5%) | Degree of fitness for performance objectives (points) | 2.1 |
| Degree of project necessity (points) | 1.5 |
| Capital inputs (51.1%) | Capital availability rate (%) | 2.2 |
| Unit area investment amount (yuan/hm−2) | 3.3 |
| Process (18.7%) | Construction specifications (44.6%) | Task completion rate (%) | 3.2 |
| The soundness of management system (points) | 5.1 |
| Project quality (32.9%) | Clarity of quality standards (points) | 2.0 |
| Effectiveness of control measures (points) | 4.2 |
| Financial monitoring (22.5%) | Deviation rate of fund expenditure (%) | 2.9 |
| Normality of expenditure (points) | 1.3 |
| Output (29.3%) | Construction effectiveness (75.2%) | Completion rate of well-facilitated farmland (%) | 8.6 |
| Road accessibility rate (%) | 3.9 |
| Irrigation coverage rate (%) | 6.2 |
| Land leveling rate (%) | 3.3 |
| Project quality (24.8%) | Acceptance pass rate (%) | 7.3 |
| Benefit (41.2%) | Economic benefits (46.3%) | Increase in grain production per mu (kg·hm−2) | 7.9 |
| Increase in annual income per capita (yuan·hm−2) | 11.2 |
| Ecological benefits (21.6%) | Water-saving rate of the project (%) | 5.5 |
| Degree of ecological improvement (points) | 3.4 |
| Social benefits (32.1%) | Public satisfaction (%) | 9.9 |
| Beneficiaries’ compliance rate (%) | 3.3 |
|
