|
| Indicators | The proportion of project grades (%) |
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | Obstacle factor |
|
| X 1 degree of project necessity (points) | 95.0 | 5.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| X 2 degree of procedural compliance (points) | 85.0 | 15.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| X 3 degree of fitness for performance objectives (points) | 75.5 | 24.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| X 4 degree of project necessity (points) | 62.5 | 22.5 | 15.0 | 0 | 15.0 |
| X 5 capital availability rate (%) | 75.0 | 25.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| X 6 unit area investment amount (million yuan/hm−2) | 87.5 | 12.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| X 7 task completion rate (%) | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| X 8 the soundness of management system (points) | 35.0 | 10.0 | 30.0 | 25.0 | 55.0 |
| X 9 clarity of quality standards (points) | 71.5 | 22.5 | 6.0 | 0 | 0 |
| X 10 effectiveness of control measures (points) | 82.5 | 17.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| X 11 deviation rate of fund expenditure (%) | 75.0 | 25.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| X 12 normality of expenditure (points) | 75.0 | 25.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| X 13 completion rate of well-facilitated farmland (%) | 85.0 | 15.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| X 14 road accessibility rate (%) | 25.0 | 15.0 | 34.5 | 25.5 | 60.0 |
| X 15 irrigation coverage rate (%) | 75.0 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 0 | 12.5 |
| X 16 land leveling rate (%) | 35.5 | 30.0 | 24.5 | 10.0 | 34.5 |
| X 17 acceptance pass rate (%) | 60.5 | 22.5 | 8.5 | 8.5 | 17.0 |
| X 18 increase in grain production per mu (kg·hm−2) | 20.5 | 29.5 | 25 | 25 | 50 |
| X 19 increase in annual income per capita (million yuan·hm−2) | 0.00 | 37.5 | 21.0 | 21.0 | 42.0 |
| X 20 water-saving rate of the project (%) | 80.0 | 10.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 10.0 |
| X 21 degree of ecological improvement (points) | 50.0 | 21.5 | 13.8 | 14.7 | 28.5 |
| X 22 public satisfaction (%) | 0.00 | 37.5 | 25.0 | 37.5 | 62.5 |
| X 23 beneficiaries’ compliance rate (%) | 50.0 | 25.0 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 25.0 |
|
