Research Article
Awareness Level of Business Students regarding Drinking Water Safety and Associated Adulteration Accidents: A Multinomial Logistic Regression Approach
Table 2
Student awareness of drinking water safety (statistical results).
| | Faisalabad (total) | Chak Jhumra | Faisalabad Sadar | Jaranwala | Samundri | Tandlianwala | N | %Age | N | %Age | N | %Age | N | %Age | N | %Age | N | %Age |
| Panel 1: Main source of drinking water | Tap water | 153 | 37.2 | 30 | 35.7 | 21 | 36.8 | 42 | 38.9 | 24 | 44.4 | 36 | 33.3 | Barreled or bottled water | 138 | 33.6 | 21 | 25.0 | 24 | 42.1 | 33 | 30.6 | 21 | 38.9 | 39 | 36.1 | Well water | 57 | 13.9 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 18 | 16.7 | 6 | 11.1 | 15 | 13.9 | Spring water | 9 | 2.2 | 12 | 14.3 | 6 | 10.5 | 3 | 2.8 | 3 | 5.6 | 3 | 2.8 | Others | 54 | 13.1 | 21 | 25.0 | 6 | 10.5 | 12 | 11.1 | 0 | 0.0 | 15 | 13.9 |
| Panel 2: Attention to local drinking water quality | Special attention | 147 | 36.0 | 27 | 32.1 | 27 | 47.4 | 42 | 38.9 | 12 | 23.5 | 39 | 36.1 | Comparatively high attention | 123 | 30.2 | 30 | 35.7 | 12 | 21.1 | 27 | 25.0 | 21 | 41.2 | 33 | 30.6 | Not concerned | 114 | 27.9 | 24 | 28.6 | 15 | 26.3 | 30 | 27.8 | 12 | 23.5 | 33 | 30.6 | No answer | 24 | 5.9 | 3 | 3.6 | 3 | 5.3 | 9 | 8.3 | 6 | 11.8 | 3 | 2.8 |
| Panel 3: Satisfaction level with drinking water quality | Very satisfied | 90 | 21.9 | 18 | 21.4 | 6 | 10.5 | 15 | 13.9 | 18 | 33.3 | 33 | 30.6 | Relatively satisfied | 255 | 62.0 | 54 | 64.3 | 45 | 79.0 | 60 | 55.6 | 33 | 61.1 | 63 | 58.3 | Dissatisfied | 45 | 11.0 | 9 | 10.7 | 3 | 5.3 | 21 | 19.4 | 3 | 5.6 | 9 | 8.3 | No answer | 21 | 5.1 | 3 | 3.6 | 3 | 5.3 | 12 | 11.1 | 0 | 0.0 | 3 | 2.8 |
| Panel 4: Trust level in the safety of drinking water | Confident | 117 | 28.5 | 39 | 46.4 | 18 | 31.6 | 21 | 19.4 | 15 | 27.8 | 24 | 22.2 | Relatively confident | 114 | 27.7 | 21 | 25.0 | 18 | 31.6 | 21 | 19.4 | 21 | 38.9 | 33 | 30.6 | Somewhat worried | 138 | 33.6 | 21 | 25.0 | 9 | 15.8 | 51 | 47.2 | 0 | 0.0 | 42 | 38.9 | Extremely worried | 30 | 7.3 | 3 | 3.6 | 9 | 15.8 | 9 | 8.3 | 15 | 27.8 | 9 | 8.3 | No answer | 12 | 2.9 | 0 | 0.0 | 3 | 5.3 | 6 | 5.6 | 3 | 5.6 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Panel 5: Awareness of problems with tap water quality | Never had problems | 99 | 24.1 | 24 | 28.6 | 12 | 21.1 | 21 | 19.4 | 18 | 33.3 | 24 | 22.2 | Had problems once or twice a year | 144 | 35.0 | 24 | 28.6 | 24 | 42.1 | 27 | 25.0 | 24 | 44.4 | 45 | 41.7 | Had problems frequently | 138 | 33.6 | 27 | 32.1 | 18 | 31.6 | 48 | 44.4 | 6 | 11.1 | 39 | 36.1 | No answer | 30 | 7.3 | 9 | 10.7 | 3 | 5.3 | 12 | 11.1 | 6 | 11.1 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Panel 6: Measures taken to solve problems that arise with tap water | Solve problems by themselves | 195 | 47.5 | 57 | 67.9 | 33 | 57.9 | 30 | 27.8 | 33 | 61.1 | 42 | 38.9 | Help by local water utility | 102 | 24.8 | 6 | 7.1 | 0 | 0.0 | 39 | 36.1 | 15 | 27.8 | 42 | 38.9 | Complain to the local department of health | 36 | 8.8 | 3 | 3.6 | 9 | 15.8 | 12 | 11.1 | 3 | 5.6 | 9 | 8.3 | Help by the residential property maintenance staff | 39 | 9.5 | 12 | 14.3 | 9 | 15.8 | 12 | 11.1 | 0 | 0.0 | 6 | 5.6 | Call the local government telephone hotline for help | 39 | 9.5 | 6 | 7.1 | 6 | 10.5 | 15 | 13.9 | 3 | 5.6 | 9 | 8.3 |
|
|