Research Article

[Retracted] Sentiment Grading and Evaluation of Network Resources of Ideological and Political Education in Colleges and Universities: A Research Based on Artificial Intelligence

Table 8

Regression results of male and female groups.

(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)

Explanatory variablesolsolsolsolsolswls

Story0.0006610.02310.06250.1230.1350.159
(0.01)(0.33)(1.02)(1.87)(1.98)(2.61)

Positive−0.00641−0.00773−0.00760−0.00249−0.00354−0.00165
(−2.22)(−2.60)(−2.93)(−0.89)(−1.23)(−0.64)

Negative0.006290.01390.00945−0.005080.002010.000530
(0.93)(1.99)(1.58)(−0.78)(0.30)(0.09)

Diversity0.5560.6550.3220.7620.8570.577
(3.68)(4.29)(2.42)(5.22)(5.80)(4.38)

Characters0.05900.04650.04120.02880.01600.0123
(3.81)(2.85)(2.97)(1.92)(1.01)(0.89)

Common words−0.00126−0.000922−0.00112−0.000939
(−3.50)(−3.02)(−3.20)(−3.12)

Difficult words0.004410.003240.004010.00348
(3.97)(3.47)(3.73)(3.79)

Illustration−0.0432−0.0359−0.0623−0.0509
(−1.62)(−1.56)(−2.41)(−2.23)

_Cons3.5413.6064.0483.4753.5743.895
(58.06)(37.83)(49.23)(58.90)(38.77)(47.84)
N3 3883 3883 3883 3883 3883 388

Note. , , indicate significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% levels, respectively; the t values of the variables are in brackets.