COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance, Attitude, Hesitancy, and Its Associated Factors among Wolaita Sodo University Students: A Mixed-Method Study

Lombebo, Afework Alemu; Wolde, Getahun Dendir; Shomoro, Bezabish Taffese; Efa, Amelework Gonfa; Bscho, Mebratu Tila; Suleiman, Elias Habtu; Temesgen, Ashagrie Sintayhu; Arega, Mahlet Zerfu; Obsa, Mohammed Suleiman

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/2082695

Journal of Environmental and Public Health

On this page

Abstract Introduction Methods Discussion Conclusion Abbreviations Data Availability Ethical Approval Consent Conflicts of Interest References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2023 | Article ID 2082695 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/2082695

COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance, Attitude, Hesitancy, and Its Associated Factors among Wolaita Sodo University Students: A Mixed-Method Study

Afework Alemu Lombebo,¹Getahun Dendir Wolde,²Bezabish Taffese Shomoro,²Amelework Gonfa Efa,¹Mebratu Tila Bscho,²Elias Habtu Suleiman,²Ashagrie Sintayhu Temesgen,²Mahlet Zerfu Arega,³and Mohammed Suleiman Obsa⁴

Academic Editor: Giovanna Deiana

Received21 Sept 2022

Revised29 Mar 2023

Accepted06 Apr 2023

Published01 Jun 2023

Abstract

Background. Countries in the world have been experiencing the ongoing impact and spread of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) virus pandemic. The health and financial burden of the pandemic has prompted the need for timely and effective vaccination to be considered as the best strategy for controlling disease transmission. However, vaccine acceptability remains an area of concern in developing countries like Ethiopia. Objective. To assess attitude, hesitancy in the COVID-19 vaccine acceptance, and associated factors among health science students at Wolaita Sodo University. Methods. A triangulated mixed-method study was conducted. Quantitative data were entered into SPSS Windows version 25 for analysis, and the qualitative data were transcribed using open code version 4.3. A binary logistic regression model was used to establish the association between dependent and independent variables. Adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to measure the strengths of the association. Thematic approach was used for qualitative data analysis. Results. A total of 352 students participated in this study. Having family members who were infected with COVID-19, information about COVID-19 vaccine, the need for a vaccine with the level of concern, intention to take COVID-19 vaccine, and academic year were strongly associated with vaccine acceptability. Graduating class and other senior students were about 4 and 2 times more likely to accept vaccination as compared to freshman-year students (AOR = 4.128; 95% CI: 1.351–12.610;) and (AOR = 2.195; 95% CI: 1.182–4.077; value = 0.013), respectively. Even if 67% of students had a good attitude towards the vaccine, 56% of the students hesitated to take the vaccine. Conclusion. The majority of respondents had a constructive attitude towards the COVID-19 vaccine, and only a few of them were vaccinated against the COVID-19 virus. It is of utmost importance to design an evidence-based strategy to increase the uptake of vaccination for healthcare students and other nonhealth science students in universities.

1. Introduction

1.1. Background

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO) in February 2020, and since then, many countries have been suffering from its spread and impact. Countries in the world have taken public health measures to prevent the spread of COVID-19, such as social distancing, face masks, and vaccination [1]. The virus had an impact on countries all over the globe. There are a total of 380 million confirmed cases and 5.7 million deaths due to COVID-19 at the beginning of 2022. In Ethiopia, the first confirmed cases of COVID-19 were on March 13, 2020. Since then, more than 465,000 confirmed cases of COVID-19 and 7,300 deaths were reported by January 2022 [2].

Although the world has been implementing various COVID-19 prevention strategies, the burden of the pandemic is not notably reduced [3–5]. Owing to significant determination, research, and manufacturing, COVID-19 vaccines were developed shortly afterward [6]. The health and economic burden of the pandemic has caused the need for a timely and effective vaccination to control the spread of the disease [7].

Even though the WHO backed COVID-19 vaccines global access (COVAX) program aims to supply millions of doses for Africa to vaccinate at least 20% of the population, the COVID-19 pandemic continues rapidly [8]. The effectiveness of any vaccination program depends on the awareness, behaviour, and voluntary will of participants [9]. On March 7, 2021, Ethiopians formally began the COVID vaccine as an effective national event after the WHO launched the COVAX program for Africans. Initially, front-line healthcare workers were vaccinated, and later on, the elderly and patients with comorbidities were vaccinated against COVID-19 [10].

University students are informed adults who have higher chances of disseminating the virus but a lower risk of developing COVID-19 complications [11]. Health science students are vulnerable to infectious diseases due to their exposure to clinical practice [12]. A universal evaluation of healthcare professions along with students from 39 countries showed that the rate of hesitancy towards COVID-19 vaccination was 18.9% [13]. Moreover, knowledge gaps regarding vaccine welfare and efficacy have been reported among health science students [14]. Studies conducted in divergent nations have shown that inaccurate information and lack of confidence in vaccines are associated with poor acceptance of vaccines [15, 16]. Despite the success of developing the vaccine against COVID-19, vaccine hesitancy has now become the world’s new challenge.

According to the world health organization, vaccination hesitancy is a behaviour that is driven by a variety of circumstances, such as concerns with vaccines or vaccine providers, complacency about the need for a vaccine, and access. People who are vaccine-hesitant are a diverse group who differ in their level of uncertainty regarding certain vaccinations or vaccination in general. Vaccine hesitancy is the result of a complex decision-making process that is influenced by individual and group and vaccine-specific factors, such as communication and media, religion, socioeconomic factors, politics, geographic barriers, and vaccination experience [17–19].

To guarantee effective global vaccination, it is important to inquire about the reasons behind vaccine hesitancy. A handful of studies were conducted on the issue of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and hesitancy among healthcare workers in Ethiopia, and no notable research has been conducted among Ethiopian university students. This is one of the pioneering mixed-method studies in Ethiopia focusing on university students’ intentions to be vaccinated against COVID-19 and could help the government, policymakers, and educators identify students with uncertainty and plan successful actions to enhance tolerance to vaccination. There is scarce information regarding the attitude of university students towards COVID-19 vaccination in the country, particularly in the study area. The study aimed to assess the attitudes, hesitancy, and associated factors of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Setting

A triangulated mixed-method study was conducted on COVID-19 vaccine acceptance, attitude, hesitancy, and its associated factors among Wolaita Sodo University students from October 1 to November 30, 2021. Wolaita Sodo University endorses various academic programs in health science and medicine. In general, there are Doctor of Philosophy (PhDs), specialties, masters, and undergraduate programs in health science including medicine. It is located 327 km from Addis Ababa, the capital city of Ethiopia, and 160 km from Hawassa, the capital city of the southern nation nationalities and people’s regional state. The data showed that a total of 1705 students were registered and learning in health and medicine college during the study period, of which 611 (35.8%) were females and 1094 (64.1%) were males. All Wolaita Sodo University College of Health Sciences and medicine students were our source population while selected students who regularly attended their studies at Wolaita Sodo University College of health science and medicine during data collection time were our study population.

2.2. Sample Size Determination

Because research on the adoption of the COVID-19 vaccine among Ethiopian university students has been scarce, the best estimate (P) of 50% was employed in this study. The single population proportion formula was used to calculate the sample size, which had a value of 0.5, a 95% confidence interval, and a margin of error of 5%. Sampling interval K was calculated as being equal to 4.4. To select the study participants, a systematic random sampling method was adopted. Therefore, using the first four students’ names from the list they received from the registrar’s office and choosing every fourth student based on the order of their names on the list, the lottery method was used to determine the first participant. With a 10% nonresponse rate, the final sample was 382.

2.3. Data Collection Tool and Technique

The data collection procedures involve two phases. The first phase is a quantitative survey, which includes a structured self-administered questionnaire, and the second phase is qualitative. Tape records, pens, and notes were used during the interviews. Ten in-depth interviews were conducted and each lasted between 40 and 60 minutes. The quantitative part consists of three sections: part I includes sociodemographic characteristics and students’ academic status; part II is about information and knowledge about the COVID-19 vaccine; and part III contains questions about attitude and hesitancy regarding the acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine. There were 9 attitude statements towards COVID-19 vaccines on a 5-point Likert scale (5 = completely sure, 4 = very sure, 3 = moderately sure, 2 = slightly sure, and 1 = not at all sure) and 5 questions about hesitancy using a 5-point Likert scale (5 = completely likely, 4 = very likely, 3 = moderately likely, 2 = slightly likely, and 1 = not at all likely) regarding concern about COVID-19 vaccines. There were also open-ended questions for the qualitative part of the study assessing attitude and hesitancy. Each study participant was addressed from the registrar list; first, we identified their academic year and departments’ and then the questionnaire was given to those selected students for a quantitative study. For the qualitative part, purposively selected students were interviewed until data saturation was declared by the researcher.

2.4. Glossary

Freshman Students. This includes first year university students. Good Attitude. The total attitude score of each participant was calculated by summing up the raw score of nine statements. Participants with a score above the mean were considered to have a good attitude. High Hesitancy. Participants who scored below the mean were considered to have high hesitancy. Poor Attitude. Participants who scored below the mean were considered having a poor attitude. Poor Hesitancy. The total score of hesitancy of each participant was calculated by summing up the raw score of five statements. Participants who scored above the mean were considered to have poor hesitancy. Senior Students. This includes students who have completed the first year of study. Vaccine Acceptance. It is a decision of an individual to accept or refuse a vaccine when presented with an opportunity to vaccinate. Vaccine Hesitancy. This means the doubts or concerns towards vaccinations, without referring to actual vaccine receipt.

2.5. Data Quality Assurance

To ensure the quality of the data, supervisors and data collectors were trained on the objective of the study, data collection tools, and procedures. Investigators closely monitored the data collection process. The supervisors checked for data completeness and accuracy. Then, the data were coded, computed, and cleaned. Each member of the team checked the content of in-depth interviews. Probing questions were used to promote the free flow of information. Finally, the summary of each interview was repeated for each study participant, and the text of each interview was double-checked by the investigators.

2.6. Data Processing and Analysis

Quantitative data were entered into Epi Data Version 4.6.2 and then transported to SPSS Version 25 for analysis. Descriptive statistics and bivariable analysis were performed. Variables that had associations in the bivariable model at were entered into a multivariable logistic regression model to determine the effects of individual variables on patients’ perceptions of preoperative fasting guidelines. An adjusted odd ratio (OR) with 95% CI is used to measure the strength of associations. Statistical significance is declared at . For qualitative analysis, the Amharic audio-recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim into word files and translated into English. All interviews were audio-recorded after taking informed verbal consent, and then a unique identification number was assigned to every interviewee. Audio data were transcribed verbatim and translated into English. The data were first saved in plain text format and then imported into open code software version 4.03 to facilitate coding and categorizing. The investigators read each transcript repeatedly to ensure a degree of standardization and began the coding process. The coded data were compared and organized into groups. Finally, a thematic approach was used to classify and organize the data into key categories. Direct quotes from study participants were narrated word for word.

3. Result

3.1. Sociodemographic Characteristics

From a total of 382 students, 352 completed the online questionnaire, making the response rate 92%. The majority were aged between 20 and 30 years with a mean age of 23.72 (SD = 3.07). More than half of the students were male 210 (59.7%) and 148 (42%) of the participants were orthodox religion followers. 249 (70.7%) of the participants were senior year students and 149 (42.3%) had an average GPA of between 3.00 and 3.49. Regarding the educational level, the majority 289 (82.1) are undergraduate students (Table 1).

3.2. Participants’ Experience of COVID-19

The source of information for the COVID-19 virus and vaccine for the majority of the students was social media 177 (50.3%), and 200 (56.3%) of them have adequate information about the vaccine. Among the 352 students, 232 (65.9%) take COVID-19 preventive measures, but only 50 (14.2%) have been vaccinated against COVID-19. 90 (25.6%) of the students’ family members were vaccinated for COVID-19 and 45 (12.8%) of the family members were infected with the COVID-19 virus (Table 2).

3.3. Intention towards COVID-19 Vaccines

Out of 352 students, 252 (71.6%) intended to receive the vaccine, of which more than one-third, that is, 145 (41.2%) took the vaccine to protect themselves from getting the virus. The other reasons mentioned by the students for being vaccinated were 43 (12.2%) believing that the vaccines are effective and 35 (9.9%) to protect others from getting the virus. The majority of the students, that is, 314 (89.2%) did not oppose the COVID-19 vaccine.

3.4. Reasons for Nonacceptance of COVID-19 Vaccine

The majority of the students 302 (85.8%) were not vaccinated against the COVID-19 vaccine, and when asked about the reasons for nonacceptance, the majority of them raised accessibility issues. For example, a 22-year-old female graduating student mentioned the following:

“I have been asking to be vaccinated but here in the hospital the vaccine is only given to staff and in the community for the elderly and those with chronic illness I wanted to be vaccinated but the vaccine is not accessible to students in our university.”

The majority of respondents did not want to take the vaccine if it was available, and they gave various reasons. For example, a 22-year-old male senior student stated the following:

“I do not want to be vaccinated because I doubt the effectiveness of the vaccine. I have seen many people who took the vaccine and get infected with the virus repeatedly. So for me, there is no difference between vaccinated and unvaccinated.”

Of the 352 students, 214 (60.8%) were less likely to take the COVID-19 vaccine; this finding is supported qualitatively because the majority of the study participants stated that they do not want to take the vaccine for the fear of being controlled by the vaccine manufacturers and suppliers (Table 3). For example, a 29-year-old male senior student stated the following:

“I do not want to be vaccinated because I don’t want to be under the control of anyone. I believe that the vaccine has a microchip along with it to control and manipulate human beings in the entire world and I think the vaccines are fabricated intentionally for this purpose. In addition to that, I don’t trust the suppliers.”

3.5. Student Attitude towards COVID-19 Vaccine

Participants’ attitude and hesitancy towards the COVID-19 vaccine were assessed with statements on a 5-point Likert scale. Our study revealed that 67% had a positive attitude towards the COVID-19 vaccine (Table 4). 56% had high hesitancy towards the COVID-19 vaccine (Tables 4 and 5).

3.6. Associated Factors towards the Attitude of COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance

More than two-thirds of 236 (67%) of the students had a positive attitude towards the COVID-19 vaccine. A large number of respondents (197 (56%)) were found to have high hesitancy about being vaccinated against the COVID-19 vaccine. Having a family member with a history of COVID-19 infection, information about the COVID-19 vaccine, the need for a vaccine with the level of concern, intention to take the COVID-19 vaccine, and academic year were strongly associated with vaccine acceptance. Graduating class and other senior students were about 4 and 2 times more likely to accept vaccination as compared to freshman-year students (AOR = 4.128; 95% CI: 1.351–12.610; ) and (AOR = 2.195; CI: 1.182–4.077; value = 0.013), respectively. In addition, students who had a family member with a history of COVID-19 infection were about 3 times more likely to accept vaccination than their counterparts (AOR = 23.317; CI: 1.133–5.754; value = 0.009) (Table 6).

4. Discussion

World Health Organization reported vaccine hesitancy as one of the top 10 threats to manage vaccine-preventable diseases [20]. Vaccine hesitancy stems from deep-rooted ideological beliefs and conspiracies [21]. Vaccines from various companies have currently been accepted but their dispensation is limited [22]. Identifying the populations’ intent and challenges to vaccination could minimize barriers and increase vaccination. This study determined the acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine and associated factors among university students. Therefore, identifying acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine among university students and the factors that determine vaccine hesitancy and attitude towards the vaccine is important in the expansion of efficient health education strategies.

Pieces of research disclosed vaccine acceptability among higher education students in this region. 85.9% of the students were not vaccinated for COVID-19 during the time of investigation; however, our findings show that the likelihood of taking the vaccine was low at 39.2%. This finding is comparable with the study from 37.3% in Uganda [23], 37.4% in Jordan [24], health science students in Egypt (35%) [25], and college students in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia (39.8%) [26]. But the current study finding was lower than findings in Lebanon 87% [27], in China 88.6% [28] in Saudi Arabia 64.7% (27) [29], Qatar (62.5%) [30], in USA 75% (29) [31] and Italy (86%) [32].

Those variations might be due to the variety of types of vaccines available across the world and insight differences towards the vaccine among study groups. Even so, while reconnoitering the reasons behind low acceptance of the vaccine, we note that a significant portion of students reported that they were disquieted about the vaccine’s safety, effectiveness, and possible adverse effects, as a similar study was conducted in Saudi Arabia students [29]. The majority of the students stated that the most common reason for being unvaccinated was the accessibility issue of the vaccine and additionally also a limited alternative was available in Ethiopia including the study area at the time of the investigation. In the open-ended section of the questionnaire, one of our students stated that “I do not want to be vaccinated because I doubt the effectiveness of the vaccine. I have seen many people who took the vaccine and get infected with the virus repeatedly.” Therefore, it is extremely important to induce them on the vaccine’s safety, efficacy, and side effects.

Eventually, in our binary logistic regression, students from rural regions proved to have a 28.3% lower positive attitude towards the COVID-19 vaccine compared to those from the urban regions. Our finding was consistent with the study performed in Bangladesh [33, 34]. More than 85% of Ethiopian people reside in rural areas which remarkably affects their knowledge about COVID-19-related issues. This is because most areas lack adequate internet connections and have poor technology exposure. Evidence suggested that students who had a history of COVID-19 infection presumably had good knowledge and a positive attitude, but our finding shows that only 6.3% of students have been infected with COVID-19 [35].

The academic level of respondents was significantly associated with the multivariate analysis. Graduate class students had a higher positive attitude towards the COVID-19 vaccine than freshman students. This differs from the findings of Bangladeshi [33], Iran [36], and Bangladeshi [34]. Graduate class students had adequate information because they get information from different sources during the COVID-19 era than freshman students.

Our finding indicates that 50% and 41.5% of the students knew about the COVID-19 vaccine through social media and mass media, respectively, which corroborates a prior study conducted by Mannan DKA [37]. The majority of university students consume the contents of social media which has increased their exposure to COVID-19 facts. Following COVID-19, many people turned to social media for information and guidance. This behaviour has both positive and negative aspects. These range from the spread of misinformation to social media’s indispensable role in the dissemination of accurate information and mental health education. The ease of access to information is a significant benefit of social media and other digital platforms. This ease of access provides numerous opportunities for education. However, the spread of misinformation on social media and other digital platforms has been identified as a public health threat on par with the virus itself [38–40]. More than half of the students had adequate knowledge about the vaccine but this finding is worrisome as 43.2% of respondents had inadequate information. Since all students are at a higher institution with sufficient scholastic qualifications, it was expected that they possess decent knowledge about the vaccine. This symbolizes a lack of self-awareness, which results in a paucity of knowledge about the vaccine [41].

In terms of demographic variables, around 43.8% of the college students in our sample stated that they were not encouraged by the healthcare providers to be vaccinated against COVID-19. This result calls for the need for every healthcare provider to work on their patients as people tend to listen more to the counselling given by healthcare workers [28, 42].

In our study, 56.0% of the students reported hesitancy to take the COVID-19 vaccine which is lower than a study done in the general population of Ethiopia (68.6%) (38) and similar studies done in Uganda (62.7%) [23], and the finding of Latkin CA reported 60.6% [43]. This variation between our study participants and the general population might be due to the relatively higher level of knowledge and access to a wide range of information of university students. However, it is higher than a study done on university students in the USA (47.5%) (40), Egypt (19.4%) [25], and Northwest China (22%) [44]; this can be due to the differences in the vaccine types provided for different nations and misinformation about the vaccine.

Similarly, 65.9% of the students who thought of other alternative self-protection behaviours other than vaccination were highly likely to hesitate about vaccination. The experience of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and denial among health science students is concerning [45, 46]. Shreds of evidence revealed that this might be because of inaccurate information [46]. Convincing a good number of higher education students is, therefore, of public health importance [13]. Higher education centres have to promote educational and social campaigns to shed light on the importance of the COVID-19 vaccine to change the behaviour of their students [44].

Our study included nearly proportional groups of male (59.7%) and female (40.3%) students. While this study was conducted in October, COVID-19 infection was rapidly increasing in Ethiopia. About 71.6% of the students intended to take the COVID-19 vaccine if the vaccines were available. This is higher than a study done on the population of Ethiopia (31.4%) (38), Saudi Arabia (64.7%) [29], and Jordan (36.8%) [47], and it was consistent with the percentage reported by a global survey that included participants from 19 countries (71.5%) [28] and a study done in Bangladeshi (72%) [34]. Even though supported by the previous study, it is much lower than similar studies done in Ecuador (97%) [48] and China (91.3%) [49].

Nowadays, people’s attitude towards the COVID-19 vaccine is changing because most of them want to end the pandemic. As a result, the intention to take the vaccine and vaccination rate is increasing. Though most students had the desire to receive a vaccine, 10.8% of them refused to take it. Willingness to protect them from the disease (41.2%) was the most mentioned motivation to take the vaccine.

4.1. Limitation of the Study

In the qualitative part of the study, participant responses might have been influenced by the interviewers’ own biases and the presence of the interviewer might have in turn affected the participant response. The qualitative findings of this study belong to those interviewed, hence may not be generalizable and transferable. However, we used methodological and investigator triangulation to increase the credibility and generalizability of the findings. Although efforts were made to ensure fidelity to the context during translation, analysis, and interpretation, errors during translation and interpretation might exist.

5. Conclusion

In the present study, having family members with a history of COVID-19 infection, information about the vaccine, the need of vaccine with the level of concern, intention to take COVID-19 vaccine, and academic year were strongly associated with vaccine acceptability. The majority of students had a positive attitude towards the COVID-19 vaccine, but only a few were vaccinated for COVID-19. More than half of the students were hesitant to take the vaccine and were still worried about vaccine safety, effectiveness, and adverse effects. These concerns continue to be major factors affecting students’ attitudes towards the COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. It is necessary to plan an evidence-based program to encourage the rate of vaccination of health science students. Creating trust towards the COVID-19 vaccine among university students via the dissemination of accurate messages is the key to the triumph of vaccinating many. Future research is needed to further investigate reasons behind COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and to assess the effectiveness of promotion strategies.

Abbreviations

AOR:	Adjusted odds ratio
WHO:	World Health Organization
COR:	Crude odds ratio
CI:	Confidence interval
GPA:	Grade point average
WSU:	Wolaita Sodo University.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Ethical Approval

Before conducting the study, ethical approval was obtained from the ethical review committee of the College of Health Science and Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University.

Written and verbal informed consent was obtained from the study participants for the publication of the study. Before the data collection, the purpose of the study was explained to all study participants. Participants’ name was not written so that the collected data remained anonymous and the information obtained was kept confidential. The in-depth interviews were held in a private room to maintain participants’ privacy. No potentially identifiable data or images of the study participants were included in this study. The participants had the right to withdraw from the study at any time during the data collection without any cost.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

Y. Cui, S. Ni, and S. Shen, “A network-based model to explore the role of testing in the epidemiological control of the COVID-19 pandemic,” BMC Infectious Diseases, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 58–12, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Worldometer, “Coronavirus E. 13,968 cases and 223 deaths,” 2020, https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/ethiopia/.
View at: Google Scholar
Z. W. Belete, G. Berihun, A. Keleb et al., “Knowledge, attitude, and preventive practices towards COVID-19 and associated factors among adult hospital visitors in South Gondar Zone Hospitals, Northwest Ethiopia,” PLoS One, vol. 16, no. 5, Article ID e0250145, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. I. Kaadan, J. Abdulkarim, M. Chaar, O. Zayegh, and M. A. Keblawi, “Determinants of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in the Arab world: a cross-sectional study,” Global Health Research and Policy, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 23–27, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Troiano and A. Nardi, “Vaccine hesitancy in the era of COVID-19,” Public Health, vol. 194, pp. 245–251, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Glanville, COVID-19 Vaccines: Development, Evaluation, Approval and Monitoring [Internet], Eur Med Agency, Zuidas, south Amsterdam, 2021.
V. D. Tran, T. V. Pak, E. I. Gribkova et al., “Determinants of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in a high infection-rate country: a cross-sectional study in Russia,” Pharmacy in Practice, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 2276, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Triggle and R. Schraer, Covid-19 Vaccine: Allergy Warning over New Jab, BBC News, London, UK, 2020.
M. Al-Mohaithef and B. K. Padhi, “<p>Determinants of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in Saudi Arabia: a web-based national survey<</p>,” Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, vol. 13, pp. 1657–1663, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Mesele, “COVID-19 vaccination acceptance and its associated factors in Sodo Town, Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia: cross-sectional study,” Infection and Drug Resistance, vol. 14, pp. 2361–2367, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. P. Tavolacci, P. Dechelotte, and J. Ladner, “COVID-19 vaccine acceptance, hesitancy, and resistancy among university students in France,” Vaccines, vol. 9, no. 6, p. 654, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Jain, S. Saurabh, P. Kumar et al., “COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among medical students in India,” Epidemiology and Infection, vol. 149, p. e132, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Mustapha, J. Khubchandani, and N. Biswas, “COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy in students and trainees of healthcare professions: a global assessment and call for action,” Brain, Behavior, and Immunity-Health, vol. 17, 2021.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Baldolli, J. Michon, R. Verdon, and A. Fournier, “Vaccination perception and coverage among healthcare students in France in 2019,” BMC Medical Education, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 508–510, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. S. Green, R. Abdullah, S. Vered, and D. Nitzan, “A study of ethnic, gender and educational differences in attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccines in Israel–implications for vaccination implementation policies,” Israel Journal of Health Policy Research, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 26–12, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Handebo, M. Wolde, K. Shitu, and A. Kassie, “Determinant of intention to receive COVID-19 vaccine among school teachers in Gondar City, Northwest Ethiopia,” PLoS One, vol. 16, no. 6, Article ID e0253499, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. E. MacDonald, “Vaccine hesitancy: definition, scope and determinants,” Vaccine, vol. 33, no. 34, pp. 4161–4164, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. J. Larson, C. Jarrett, E. Eckersberger, D. M. Smith, and P. Paterson, “Understanding vaccine hesitancy around vaccines and vaccination from a global perspective: a systematic review of published literature,” Vaccine, vol. 32, no. 19, pp. 2150–2159, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Paterson, F. Meurice, L. R. Stanberry, S. Glismann, S. L. Rosenthal, and H. J. Larson, “Vaccine hesitancy and healthcare providers,” Vaccine, vol. 34, no. 52, pp. 6700–6706, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Grüner and F. Krüger, “The intention to be vaccinated against COVID-19: stated preferences before vaccines were available,” Applied Economics Letters, vol. 28, no. 21, pp. 1847–1851, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Dubé, M. Vivion, and N. E. MacDonald, “Vaccine hesitancy, vaccine refusal and the anti-vaccine movement: influence, impact and implications,” Expert Review of Vaccines, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 99–117, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. R. Bloom, G. J. Nowak, and W. Orenstein, “When will we have a vaccine?”—understanding questions and answers about Covid-19 vaccination,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 383, no. 23, pp. 2202–2204, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. Kanyike, R. Olum, J. Kajjimu et al., “Acceptance of the coronavirus disease-2019 vaccine among medical students in Uganda,” Tropical Medicine and Health, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 37–11, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. El-Elimat, M. M. AbuAlSamen, B. A. Almomani, N. A. Al-Sawalha, and F. Q. Alali, “Acceptance and attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccines: a cross-sectional study from Jordan,” PLoS One, vol. 16, no. 4, Article ID e0250555, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. M. Saied, E. M. Saied, I. A. Kabbash, and S. A. E. F. Abdo, “Vaccine hesitancy: beliefs and barriers associated with COVID‐19 vaccination among Egyptian medical students,” Journal of Medical Virology, vol. 93, no. 7, pp. 4280–4291, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. T. Sahile, B. Mulugeta, S. Hadush, and E. M. Fikre, “COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and its predictors among college students in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2021: a cross-sectional survey,” Patient Preference and Adherence, vol. 16, pp. 255–263, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. B. Hamdan, S. Singh, M. Polavarapu, T. R. Jordan, and N. Melhem, “COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among university students in Lebanon,” Epidemiology and Infection, vol. 149, 2021.
View at: Google Scholar
J. V. Lazarus, S. C. Ratzan, A. Palayew et al., “A global survey of potential acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine,” Nature Medicine, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 225–228, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. J. Almalki, A. A. Alotaibi, S. H. Alabdali et al., “Acceptability of the COVID-19 vaccine and its determinants among university students in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study,” Vaccines, vol. 9, no. 9, p. 943, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Al-Mulla, M. Abu-Madi, Q. M. Talafha, R. F. Tayyem, and A. M. Abdallah, “COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in a representative education sector population in Qatar,” Vaccines, vol. 9, no. 6, p. 665, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. P. Lennon, M. L. Small, R. A. Smith, L. J. Van Scoy, J. G. Myrick, and M. A. Martin, “Unique predictors of intended uptake of a COVID-19 vaccine in adults living in a rural college town in the United States,” American Journal of Health Promotion, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 180–184, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Barello, T. Nania, F. Dellafiore, G. Graffigna, and R. Caruso, “‘Vaccine hesitancy’among university students in Italy during the COVID-19 pandemic,” European Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 781–783, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Banik, M. Rahman, M. Sikder, Q. M. Rahman, and M. U. R. Pranta, “Knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to the COVID-19 pandemic among Bangladeshi youth: a web-based cross-sectional analysis,” Journal of Public Health, vol. 31, pp. 9–19, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. E. Hossain, M. S. Islam, T. K. Ghose, H. Jahan, S. Chakrobortty, and M. S. Hossen, “COVID-19 vaccine acceptability among public university students in Bangladesh: highlighting knowledge, perceptions, and attitude,” Human Vaccines and Immunotherapeutics, vol. 1, 10 pages, 2021.
View at: Google Scholar
A. S. Gershon, P. K. Lindenauer, K. C. Wilson et al., “Informing healthcare decisions with observational research assessing causal effect. An official American thoracic society research statement,” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 203, no. 1, pp. 14–23, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Erfani, R. Shahriarirad, K. Ranjbar, A. Mirahmadizadeh, and M. Moghadami, “Knowledge, attitude and practice toward the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak: a population-based survey in Iran,” Bulletin of the World Health Organization, vol. 30, no. 10, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
D. K. A. Mannan and K. M. Farhana, “Knowledge, attitude and acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine: a global cross-sectional study,” International Research Journal of Business and Social Science, vol. 6, no. 4, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Goel and L. Gupta, “Social media in the times of COVID-19,” Journal of Clinical Rheumatology, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 220–223, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. A. M. Saputri and T. Yumarni, “Social media addiction and mental health among university students during the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia,” International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, vol. 1, 15 pages, 2021.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Piltch-Loeb, E. Savoia, B. Goldberg et al., “Examining the effect of information channel on COVID-19 vaccine acceptance,” PLoS One, vol. 16, no. 5, Article ID e0251095, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Ackerman, “What is self-awareness and why is it important,” PositivePsychology. Noudettu, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Y. Fu, G. D. Zimet, C. A. Latkin, and J. G. Joseph, “Associations of trust and healthcare provider advice with HPV vaccine acceptance among African American parents,” Vaccine, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 802–807, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. A. Latkin, L. Dayton, G. Yi, B. Colon, and X. Kong, “Mask usage, social distancing, racial, and gender correlates of COVID-19 vaccine intentions among adults in the US,” PLoS One, vol. 16, no. 2, Article ID e0246970, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Zhang, J. Dean, Y. Yin et al., “Determinants of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and hesitancy: a health care student-based online survey in northwest China,” Frontiers in Public Health, vol. 9, Article ID 777565, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Karafillakis, I. Dinca, F. Apfel et al., “Vaccine hesitancy among healthcare workers in Europe: a qualitative study,” Vaccine, vol. 34, no. 41, pp. 5013–5020, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. D. Wake, “The willingness to receive COVID-19 vaccine and its associated factors:“vaccination refusal could prolong the war of this pandemic”–a systematic review,” Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, vol. 14, pp. 2609–2623, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. A. Al-Qerem and A. S. Jarab, “COVID-19 vaccination acceptance and its associated factors among a Middle Eastern population,” Frontiers in Public Health, vol. 9, Article ID 632914, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Sarasty, C. E. Carpio, D. Hudson, P. A. Guerrero-Ochoa, and I. Borja, “The demand for a COVID-19 vaccine in Ecuador,” Vaccine, vol. 38, no. 51, pp. 8090–8098, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Wang, R. Jing, X. Lai et al., “Acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination during the COVID-19 pandemic in China,” Vaccines, vol. 8, no. 3, p. 482, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2023 Afework Alemu Lombebo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies