Research Article

Food Integrity and Food Technology Concerns in Canada: Evidence from Two Public Surveys

Table 6

Marginal effects for concerns about food integrity, GM, and nanotechnology.

20162017
GM concernNanotechnology concernGM concernNanotechnology concern

Food integrity concern0.15
(17.4)
0.10
(11.8)
0.17
(18.1)
0.11
(12.4)
Sociodemographic variables
French0.04
(2.26)
−0.001
(−0.09)
0.01
(0.82)
0.001
(0.06)
Age0.001
(2.08)
0.001
(2.74)
−0.0002
(−0.40)
0.0004
(1.58)
Male−0.01
(−0.96)
−0.02
(−1.65)
−0.02
(−1.52)
−0.01
(−1.56)
Presence of children < 18 years0.06
(3.45)
0.02
(1.38)
0.01
(0.48)
−0.01
(−0.98)
Education−0.01
(−1.68)
−0.002
(−0.59)
−0.01
(−2.53)
−0.004
(−1.70)
City0.03
(2.44)
0.01
(0.55)
−0.02
(−1.14)
0.01
(1.62)
Church0.01
(2.34)
0.005
(1.44)
0.01
(2.77)
0.01
(2.36)
Farm−0.02
(−1.27)
0.005
(0.30)
−0.004
(−0.25)
−0.01
(−0.56)
Income−0.0002
(−0.83)
−0.0001
(−0.89)
−0.00001
(−0.07)
0.0001
(0.60)
Regular shopper−0.01
(−0.94)
−0.001
(−0.24)
0.002
(0.30)
−0.003
(−0.59)
Knowledge
Knowledge of science and technology−0.01
(−2.74)
−0.003
(−1.10)
−0.01
(−2.89)
−0.01
(−2.30)
Knowledge of environmental problems−0.005
(−1.37)
−0.004
(−1.53)
−0.004
(−1.15)
0.002
(0.95)
Science benefit attitude−0.01
(−4.33)
−0.01
(−3.74)
−0.02
(6.65)
−0.01
(−5.66)
Trust
Generalized trust in people−0.03
(−2.39)
−0.03
(−2.78)
−0.003
(−0.27)
−0.01
(−0.86)
Trust in government−0.03
(−3.52)
−0.02
(−3.19)
−0.03
(−4.14)
−0.01
(−1.84)
Trust in industry0.01
(0.91)
0.03
(3.72)
0.02
(1.55)
0.01
(0.65)
Trust in research organizations/universities−0.04
(−4.37)
−0.03
(4.22)
−0.02
(−2.68)
−0.03
(−4.13)
Trust in advocacy groups0.04
(4.22)
0.02
(3.53)
0.03
(2.87)
0.02
(2.81)
Environmental concerns
NHIP0.003
(1.33)
0.001
(1.02)
−0.001
(−0.73)
0.001
(0.59)
Myth of nature 1−0.02
(−0.97)
−0.02
(−0.96)
0.05
(2.47)
0.002
(0.12)
Myth of nature 2−0.02
(−1.02)
−0.01
(−0.51)
0.04
(1.83)
0.01
(0.55)
Myth of nature 30.01
(0.15)
−0.002
(−0.07)
−0.001
(−0.03)
−0.02
(−0.74)
Health engagement0.003
(2.30)
0.004
(3.92)
0.004
(3.28)
0.002
(1.68)

significant difference at the 1%, 5%, and 10% level. The marginal effects reported are for the “very high risk” category.