Combination of an E-Nose and an E-Tongue for Adulteration Detection of Minced Mutton Mixed with Pork

Table 4

Comparison results of discriminant analysis for responses of E-nose and E-tongue to minced mutton adulterated with pork.

Discrimination method	Evaluation indices	E-nose	E-tongue
		75^th s	120^th s
Bayesian discriminant analysis	Number of misclassified	7	0
	Percentage of misclassified (%)	5.83	0
CDA-linear discriminant function	Number of misclassified	13	3
	Percentage of misclassified (%)	10.83	2.5
CDA-quadratic discriminant function	Number of misclassified	13	2
	Percentage of misclassified (%)	10.83	1.67
	Averaged percentage of misclassified (%)	9.16	1.39