Influence of Selenium on Growth, Physiology, and Antioxidant Responses in Maize Varies in a Dose-Dependent Manner

Naseem, Munaza; Anwar-ul-Haq, Muhammad; Wang, Xiukang; Farooq, Naila; Awais, Muhammad; Sattar, Hina; Ahmed Malik, Hina; Mustafa, Adnan; Ahmad, Jalil; El-Esawi, Mohamed A.

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6642018

Journal of Food Quality

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusions Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 | Article ID 6642018 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6642018

Influence of Selenium on Growth, Physiology, and Antioxidant Responses in Maize Varies in a Dose-Dependent Manner

Munaza Naseem,¹Muhammad Anwar-ul-Haq,¹Xiukang Wang,²Naila Farooq,³Muhammad Awais,¹Hina Sattar,¹Hina Ahmed Malik,¹Adnan Mustafa,⁴Jalil Ahmad,⁵and Mohamed A. El-Esawi⁶

Academic Editor: Daniel Cozzolino

Received22 Dec 2020

Revised07 Mar 2021

Accepted16 Mar 2021

Published29 Mar 2021

Abstract

There is a very narrow margin in selenium deficiency and toxicity although it is an important element for humans, animals, and plants. Effects of selenium (Se) on the growth and physiomorphological parameters in maize were studied grown in soil spiked with sodium selenate (Na₂SeO₄) in 5 different concentrations (i.e., 0. 2.5, 5.0, 10.0, and 20.0 mg kg⁻¹). The growth of plants was affected by high Se concentration. However, maximum increases in plant height and root length were observed at low Se (2.5 mg kg⁻¹) which were 17.89 and 23.17%, respectively. At higher Se concentrations (20 mg kg⁻¹), a considerable reduction was observed in dry matter, root length, antioxidant enzymes, and other physiological parameters. The dry matter of plants was also analyzed for nutrient (Fe and Zn) concentrations. Results indicated that Se stress inhibits plant growth. Gas exchange parameters were also found to be decreased under stress conditions, but at a lower Se level (2.5 mg kg⁻¹), improvement in transpiration rate (63.46%), photosynthetic rate (47.47%), and stomatal conductance (54.55%) was observed. The reduction in growth attributes may be due to the high accumulation of Se in roots and the disturbance in gas exchange parameters. However, the principal component analysis revealed that higher Se levels were more hazardous for maize growth and physiological responses as compared to low Se levels.

1. Introduction

The problem of soil contamination with heavy metals and metalloids has risen from the continuous use of wastewater for irrigation, excessive fertilizer applications, increased industrialization, and other anthropogenic activities [1, 2]. Given the industrial revolution since the 19th century, there is an increased pressure on water resources and the overall environment that ultimately leads to soil pollution with heavy metals [3, 4]. Some of these metals are important for plant growth as micronutrients such as copper (Cu) [5]. But, the excessive concentration of these metals negatively affects the plant’s morphological, physiological, and biochemical attributes [6].

For human beings and animals, selenium (Se) is set among basic nutrients [7, 8]. It is also useful at low concentrations, but at higher concentrations, it causes damage in humans, animals, and plants [9]. There is a slight gap in Se toxicity and essentiality which have both health and environmental impacts; that is why many researchers characterized the Se as a “double-edged sword” [10].

Selenium enters the environment through natural and anthropogenic sources like weathering of rocks and volcanoes [11] while the anthropogenic sources and agricultural practices that raise selenium stacking in soil comprise irrigation and utilization of organic fertilizers like manures [12].

Previous studies describe that the low Se concentration improves plant growth, but at higher concentration, reduction in growth was also observed [13]. As plants show varied responses toward Se application and its uptake, so it is revealed that toxicity of Se changes among various crops [14]. As Se plays a dual role, thus in plants, it acts as an antioxidant at smaller concentrations whereas under Se stress plants can produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) that results in deterioration of several cellular processes [14].

Maize (Zea mays L.) is considered an important crop worldwide [15, 16]. The annual yield of maize in Pakistan is about 3.13 million tons [17]. It is a nutritious crop as it contains carbohydrates, starch, fiber, protein, vitamins, and minerals [18]. Maize can be used as the main ingredient in different dietary products. The maize crop has also been shown to accrue various metals, for example, cadmium [19]. Maize is also considered a metal tolerant crop [20]. So, it can also be used in heavy metal phytoremediation processes, due to the extensive biomass production, metal bioaccumulation, and translocation to the aerial part as has been shown previously [21, 22].

Selenium is considered to be an important element for many plants at lower concentrations but it causes toxicity at higher concentrations [15]. Presently, the research is concentrating on revealing the particular physiological and biochemical mechanisms that cause the positive or negative effects of Se in plants. However, the effects of Se on plant growth, physiology, and antioxidant machinery under varying concentration levels remained largely unknown. In addition, an adequate supply of micronutrients is required for the proper functioning of the plant due to their importance in the plant’s metabolism Therefore, it is important to explore the effects of Se on the uptake of these elements. Taking this background into account, we hypothesize that Se supplementation may cause variable effects on maize growth and physiology by altering antioxidant responses; however, its effects may vary depending on the dose of Se applied. The specific objectives of this study were to (i) evaluate the effects of increasing Se concentration on growth, physiological attributes, and antioxidant enzymes and (ii) assess the uptake of Fe and Zn in maize plants grown under hydroponic conditions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Design and Sample Preparation

The experiment was performed in the wirehouse of the Institute of Soil and Environmental Science (ISES), University of Agriculture, Faisalabad (UAF). The soil was sampled from the soil science farm of UAF and then air-dried, ground, sieved, and homogenized before sowing of the crop. A sodium selenate (Na₂SeO₄) was utilized as a Se source with five treatments; i.e., 0, 2.5, 5, 10, and 20 mg kg⁻¹, 2.39 mg kg⁻¹ salt was calculated for 1 mg kg⁻¹ Se and further calculation was done accordingly. The analysis of soil was also done by adopting a standard procedure to check its various physic-chemical properties (Table 1).

The experiment was set in a complete randomized design (CRD) with three repeats. Twelve kg soil was filled in plastic bags and transferred in the pots. In each pot, five seeds of maize were planted, and prescribed doses of NPK (250 : 120 : 125 kg ha⁻¹) were applied; nitrogen was applied as urea in three splits while the phosphorus (diammonium phosphate) and potassium (sulfate of potash) were applied in a single dose. After 10 days of germination, three plants per pot were established.

2.2. Measurement of Plant Growth Parameters

Plants were harvested after 60 days of sowing. Shoots and roots were isolated carefully. The fresh weights of roots and shoots were recorded at the spot by using portable electric balance, and the length of shoots and roots was also determined by a meter rod. Plant roots and shoots were washed with distilled water and sun-dried and then kept in an oven at 70°C until plants were dried completely. The dried samples were ground and preserve for further analysis of micronutrients (Fe and Zn) and Se. Before grinding, dry weights of shoots and roots were also determined.

2.3. Determination of Physiological and Gas Exchange Attributes

Before harvesting, chlorophyll contents were recorded with a chlorophyll meter (Minolta SPAD-502 Meter). Stomatal conductance, rate of photosynthesis, and rate of transpiration were monitored and recorded by an infrared gas analyzer (IRGA, LCA-4, Hoddesdon, UK) before harvesting on a fully expanded younger leaf.

Physiological parameters, i.e., relative water contents (RWC) and membrane stability index (MSI) were also recorded by collecting the fresh leaves before final harvesting [22]. In order to determine the RWC, firstly, the fresh weights of leaves were taken and for twelve hours plunged in deionized water; then, the weight of fully turgid leaf (TW) was calculated. The leaves were then kept in the oven at 67°C for 48 hours to take the dry weight (DW). To measure MSI, a 0.1 g fresh leaf sample was retained in 10 ml of distilled water in two sets. One set was placed for half an hour at 40°C, C1 (electrical conductivity) was measured, and C2 of the other set was also calculated by placing it at 100°C in a boiling water bath for 15 minutes.

The following equations were used to calculate RWC and MSI:

2.4. Determination of Antioxidant Activity

The activities of antioxidant enzymes were determined by taking a fresh leaf (0.5 g). Leaf sample was ground in five ml of fifty mM cold phosphate buffer (pH 7.8) kept in an ice bath. The subsequent homogenate was centrifuged at 15000 × g for 20 minutes at 4°C temperature. Antioxidant enzymes were determined by utilizing the supernatant. SOD activity was measured by its capacity to hinder the photoreduction of nitro blue tetrazolium [23]. Peroxidase and catalase were also measured by spectrophotometer using the method given by Aebi [24].

2.5. Chemical Analysis of Plant Samples

Dried plant samples were crushed to make powder by using a mechanical grinder. Then, these samples were processed with HNO₃ : HClO₄ with 2 : 1 proportion (method 54a of U.S. Salinity Lab staff 1954) [25]. The samples were retained overnight after adding 1g of plant sample and 10 ml di-acid mix in a conical flask. In order to get transparent material, flasks were warmed on a hot plate [26]. Afterward, samples were cooled, and 25 mL volume was made by using distilled water and kept in airtight bottles. The prepared samples were run on atomic absorption spectrophotometer (AAS) for the detection of selenium, iron, and zinc.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Results presented in this experiment were an average of 3 replicates. The statistical software package “Statistics 8.1” was used for interpreting the results [27]. The LSD test was used to compare the treatment means at . Data variability was stated as the standard deviation (SD). Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed on XLSTAT (version 2018) computer based-software.

3. Results

3.1. Growth Parameters

Different concentrations of selenium affected the growth parameters of maize. Generally, it was observed that the growth rate was faster at low selenium treatments and slowed down with increasing selenium concentration. The maximum increase in shoot length (17.89%) was noted where the Se was applied at the rate of 2.5 mg kg⁻¹ as compared to control treatment. However, the Se stress negatively affected the shoot length, and the minimum shoot length (35.27%) was recorded where Se was applied at the rate of 20 mg kg⁻¹ as compared to control plants (Table 2). The same results were also noted in fresh and dry biomass of shoot and root. Low levels of Se improve the shoot fresh weight up to 17.30% of maize plants as compared to control whereas the high level of selenium showed the lowest shoot fresh weight which was 28.24% as compared to control plants. Shoot dry weight was also observed maximum (20.37%) at low levels of selenium as compared to control and Se stress reduced the SDW 29.39% as compared to control plants.

3.2. Gas Exchange Parameters

A significant reduction in gas exchange parameters was observed as Se concentration increases and the maximum reduction was observed where Se was applied at the rate of 20 mg kg⁻¹ (Table 3). However, the application of 2.5 mg kg⁻¹ Se improved the transpiration rate, photosynthetic rate, and stomatal conductance which were 63.46%, 47.47%, and 54.55%, respectively, as compared to control plants.

3.3. Physiological Parameters

Maximum chlorophyll contents (27.19%) were observed in maize plants where the Se was applied at the rate of 2.5 mg kg⁻¹ as compared to control plants while the minimum chlorophyll contents were observed where a high dose of Se is applied which is 20 mg kg⁻¹ (Table 3). Se stress reduced chlorophyll contents (13.89%) as compared to control plants. As the concentration of Se increased, chlorophyll contents were decreased. Minimum relative water content (53.33%) was observed where a high dose of Se is applied which is 20 mg kg⁻¹ whereas the highest (85.43%) was noticed at lower selenium levels. Similarly, the maximum membrane stability index (74.33) was observed where the Se was applied at the rate of 2.5 mg kg⁻¹ while the minimum (39) was observed where a high dose of Se is applied which is 20 mg kg⁻¹. As the concentration of Se increased, the membrane stability index was decreased (Table 3).

3.4. Antioxidant Activity

Various Se concentrations affected the activities of these enzymes (). It was noticed that the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) were considerably enhanced at lower levels of Se (2.5 mg kg⁻¹) by 14.59%, as compared to control plants, but at high Se level (20 mg kg⁻¹), these activities were decreased. Activities of peroxidase (POD) and catalase (CAT) also showed improvement by 47.13% and 38.81% in plants where Se was applied at lower levels (2.5 mg kg⁻¹), as compared to control plant (Figure 1, antioxidant activity).

3.5. Selenium Concentration in Maize Plants

The Se treatments affected the shoot and root Se concentration in maize plants in a dose-dependent manner. It is noticed that as the Se concentration increases in the medium, Se concentration was also found higher in maize plants. Results revealed that the maximum Se concentration was found in roots and shoots of maize where Se was applied at the rate of 20 mg kg⁻¹ (Figure 2(a), Se concentration). The Highest Se concentrations recorded in roots and shoots were 7.03 mg kg⁻¹ and 6.30 mg kg⁻¹, respectively. However, more Se was found in roots of maize compared to shoots.

(a)

(b)

(c)

3.6. Effect of Selenium on Iron and Zinc Concentration in Maize Plants

The concentration of iron (Fe) was decreased as the concentration of Se increases (Figure 2(b), Fe concentration). Under Se stress conditions, plants show a reduction in Fe uptake but the application of Se at low levels may help plants in Fe uptake. Results of this experiment revealed that more concentration of Fe was noted in plants where Se was applied at the rate of 2.5 mg kg⁻¹ and a considerable reduction was noticed in Fe concentration where Se was applied at the rate of 20 mg kg⁻¹. However, more Fe concentration was found in roots (2.13 mg kg⁻¹) than shoots (0.94 mg kg⁻¹) of maize.

The Se treatments also affected the shoot and root Zn concentration (). Zn concentration was also increased in maize plants as the concentration of Se increases in the medium (Figure 2(c), Zn concentration). In this study, the application of higher Se treatments causes an increase in Zn concentration in shoots and roots. The highest Zn concentration was recorded where Se was applied at the rate of 20 mg kg⁻¹, i.e., 0.60 mg kg⁻¹ in shoots and 0.77 mg kg⁻¹ in roots of the maize plant. The lower rate of Zn translocation from root to shoot may be the cause of lower levels of Zn in shoots.

3.7. Results from Principal Component Analysis

The loading plots and scores of some significant studied parameters of maize under Se stress are shown in Figure 3. It can be seen that the first two components (PC1) and (PC2) of the principal component analysis showed maximum contribution and accounted for 97.71% fluctuations in the studied data. The individual contribution of PC1 and PC2 was 79.29 and 18.42%, respectively. All of the studied parameters and applied treatments were found to be displaced successfully, giving an indication that the Se significantly affected the growth, physiological, chemical, and antioxidant responses of maize under varying Se levels (Figures 3(a) and 3(b)). The highest level of Se, i.e., 20 mg kg⁻¹, was more displaced from other treatments indicating hazardous effects of higher Se levels on maize attributes. The parameters falling in PC1 were positively correlated with each other while a strongly negative relationship existed between parameters PC1 and PC2 (Figures 3(a) and 3(b)).

(a)

(b)

Figure 3

Principal component analysis of variables (parameters observed A) and observations (treatments applied B). PH: plant height, SFW; shoot fresh weight, SDW: shoot dry weight, RDW: root dry weight, RFW: root fresh weight, E: transpiration rate, A: photosynthetic rate, Gs: stomatal conductance, Chl.: chlorophyll (SPAD) contents, RWC: relative water contents, MSI: membrane stability index, Se-R: selenium in roots, Se-S: selenium in a shoot, SOD: sodium dismutase, CAT: catalase, POD: peroxidase, Zn-S: Zn in a shoot, Zn-R: Zn in roots, Fe-S: Fe in a shoot, Fe-R: Fe in roots. (a) Variable PCA. (b) Observation PCA.

4. Discussion

Results show that the application of selenium affected biomass production, and maximum biomass was observed at low levels of Se (Table 2). But under Se stress reduction in these traits was also observed. Heavy metal stress differentially affects the growth and physiology of maize [28]. Earlier research work also revealed that Se has a double effect on plant growth; at a lower concentration, it improves the growth of flue curd tobacco but its higher concentration reduced the growth [29]. In another study, Jiang et al. [17] also found the same trend in maize plants where the application of high Se dose considerably reduces the root and shoot growth of maize plant. Hawrylak-Nowak et al. [9] also observed the same trend in cucumber plants where higher selenium concentration caused a reduction in biomass production. Toxic effects of high Se application like reduction in plant growth and dry biomass were also found in tomato [30]. Similar findings were also presented in several earlier works [31]. Reduction in plant growth parameters may be because of the reduction in photosynthetic activity and chlorophyll content [12]. This was further confirmed in the present study by PCA where Se in roots and shoots was negatively correlated with a shoot and root fresh and dry biomass and plant height (Figure 3).

Various levels of Se also affect the photosynthetic and water relations of maize. These parameters play a significant role in plant development and disturbance in these mechanisms because metal stress may cause a diminution in plant growth and productivity [32–34]. The results of this study indicated that Se stress also causes a reduction in chlorophyll contents and photosynthetic parameters (Table 2). However, improvement in these parameters, which are mentioned above, was also noticed at lower Se levels (2.5 mg kg⁻¹). Low levels of Se may help in protecting chlorophyll enzymes which then improve the chlorophyll content [35]. Higher selenium concentration reduces net photosynthetic rate (A), which ultimately leads to a reduction in biomass production. Application of a higher concentration of selenium significantly reduces the transpiration rate (E) in maize genotypes and that was also confirmed in earlier findings in different crop species, e.g., sunflower [36], safflower [37], and maize [38]. Selenium stress significantly reduces the stomatal conductance (gs) in maize plants, and similar results were found in previous findings in different crops [39, 40]. The effect of Se on plants largely depends on its concentration in the growth medium. In this regard, Se was found toxic when 10 or above 10 mg kg⁻¹ was applied in growth medium for tomato plants [41, 42]. Furthermore, [43] also found that the effect of low Se concentration on the stomatal and photosynthetic cells of garlic was progressive. So, the increase in photosynthetic activities was due to the positive effect of Se on photosynthesis. Moreover, PCA revealed that high selenium level (20 mg kg⁻¹) was more displaced from control suggesting that higher levels of Se caused a maximum reduction in growth, physiology, and chemical attributes of the maize in the present study (Figure 3).

Membrane stability index and relative water contents also decrease as the Se level increases, but at lower levels (Se at the rate of 2.5 mg kg⁻¹), an improvement in both of these parameters was observed (Table 2). The reason behind this improvement might be the improvement in membrane stability [44]. Similar to these results, [45] observed the highest value of relative water content in Hordeum vulgare plants where Se was applied at low levels and reduction was observed at higher levels.

In this experiment, it is observed that under low Se concentration the accumulation of Se in shoots of maize was low. However, when the concentration of Se increases in growth media, selenium accumulation was greater. In our study, more Se was found in roots as compared to shoots. These results correspond to some earlier studies on tobacco [46] and rice [47] in which the Se concentration was found less in shoots compared to roots. These results come to an agreement with earlier findings, which describe that higher Se dose in growth media can cause a considerable improvement of Se concentration in plants [48]. Micronutrients like Fe and Zn are essential for plant growth as they are the cofactors of many enzymes and also take part in many plant activities [49]. However, the presence of selenium in high concentration competes with these micronutrients in plants and disrupts their uptake [50]. It is also noted that high Se also favors the Zn content in maize plants; however, Fe shows the opposite trend (Figures 2(b) and 2(c)). Iron concentration in roots was only increased at the lowest concentration of Se [51]. However, it is also reported in earlier studies that Se affects the uptake of various constituents [52]. Improvement in the enzyme activities in maize plants exposed to low Se level was observed in this experiment. But Se stress causes a reduction in the antioxidant activities, and the lowest values of these activities were observed at higher Se level (20 mg kg⁻¹) as shown in Figure 1. Destruction in antioxidant activity might be due to the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) under Se stress conditions [53]. These ROS adversely affect the antioxidant activity, water relation, and gas exchange parameters, which are important for normal plant growth [54]. The formation of ROS severely damages the proteins and DNA and could interfere with natural cellular functioning in plants, resulting in cellular death. Some earlier studies described that the exogenous application of selenium at lower levels can improve the antioxidant activity and the tolerance of plants [31]. Similar results of some other researches also describe that low Se doses can enhance the antioxidant activities whereas higher Se causes a reduction [15, 50].

5. Conclusions

The findings of this research illustrate that the effects of Se application on physiomorphological parameters of maize depend on Se level in growth media. All growth, physiological, water relation, and gas exchange parameters have shown improvements at low Se level but higher Se level causes reduction in all these parameters, which ultimately reduce the growth of maize plants. This reduction in growth attributes may be due to the high accumulation of Se in roots and the disturbance in gas exchange parameters. It was also noticed that the presence of Se affects the uptake of Zn and Fe in maize grown under hydroponic conditions. Future work should include investigating the underlying molecular mechanisms of Se in plants to further understand and enhance its functional role.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Conceptualization was done by M. A. H., X. W., M. A. E.-E., and A. M.; methodology, M. A. H. and X. W.; formal analysis, H. S., H. A. M., M. A. E.-E., and N. F.; software, M. A., A. M., and M. A. E.-E.; original draft preparations, M. N.; reviewing and editing, M. N., M. A. E.-E., and A. M.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Saline Agriculture Research Center (SARC), ISES, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad.

References

M. Rizwan, S. Ali, M. Adrees et al., “A critical review on effects, tolerance mechanisms and management of cadmium in vegetables,” Chemosphere, vol. 182, pp. 90–105, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Naveed, A. Mustafa, S. Q. T. A. Azhar, M. Kamran, Z. A. Zahir, and A. Núñez-Delgado, “Burkholderia phytofirmans PsJN and tree twigs derived biochar together retrieved Pb-induced growth, physiological and biochemical disturbances by minimizing its uptake and translocation in mung bean (Vigna radiata L.),” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 257, Article ID 109974, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Zhang, H. Wang, L. He et al., “Using biochar for remediation of soils contaminated with heavy metals and organic pollutants,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 8472–8483, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Kamran, Z. Malik, A. Parveen et al., “Ameliorative effects of biochar on rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) growth and heavy metal immobilization in soil irrigated with untreated wastewater,” Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 266–281, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Gautam, K. Anjani, and N. Srivastava, “In vitro evaluation of excess copper affecting seedlings and their biochemical characteristics in Carthamus tinctorius L. (variety PBNS-12),” Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 121–129, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Mathur, H. M. Kalaji, and A. Jajoo, “Investigation of deleterious effects of chromium phytotoxicity and photosynthesis in wheat plant,” Photosynthetica, vol. 54, pp. 1–9, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
N. Wan, Z. Xu, Q. Chi et al., “microRNA-33-3p involved in selenium deficiency-induced apoptosis via targeting ADAM10 in the chicken kidney,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 234, no. 8, pp. 13693–13704, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Hossain, M. Skalicky, M. Brestic et al., “Selenium biofortification: roles, mechanisms, responses and prospects,” Molecules, vol. 26, no. 4, p. 881, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Drahonovský, J. Szakova, O. Mestek et al., “Selenium uptake, transformation and inter-element interactions by selected wildlife plant species after foliar selenate application,” Environmental and Experimental Botany, vol. 125, pp. 12–19, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
B. Hawrylak-Nowak, R. Matraszek, and M. Pogorzelec, “The dual effects of two inorganic selenium forms on the growth, selected physiological parameters and macronutrients accumulation in cucumber plants,” Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, vol. 37, p. 41, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. H. Floor and G. Román-Ross, “Selenium in volcanic environments: a review,” Applied Geochemistry, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 517–531, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. M. Patterson, G. B. Paige, and K. J. Reddy, “Selenium in surface and irrigation water in the Kendrick irrigation district, Wyoming,” Environmental Monitioring and Assessment, vol. 171, pp. 267–280, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
B. Guerrero, M. Llugany, O. Palacios, and M. Valiente, “Dual effects of different selenium species on wheat,” Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 83, pp. 300–307, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Van Hoewyk, “A tale of two toxicities: malformed selenoproteins and oxidative stress both contribute to selenium stress in plants,” Annals of Botany, vol. 112, no. 6, pp. 965–972, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Wang, G. Wang, T. Guo et al., “Effects of plastic mulch and nitrogen fertilizer on the soil microbial community, enzymatic activity and yield performance in a dryland maize cropping system,” European Journal of Soil Science, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 400–412, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Ghosh, K. Brahmachari, M. Skalicky et al., “Nutrients supplementation through organic manures influence the growth of weeds and maize productivity,” Molecules, vol. 25, no. 21, p. 4924, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Jiang, Z. Chaolong, L. Dianjun et al., “Effect of exogenous selenium supply on photosynthesis, Na+ accumulation and antioxidative capacity of maize (Zea mays L.) under salinity stress,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, p. 42039, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Farooq, M. Hussain, A. Wakeel, and K. H. M. Siddique, “Salt stress in maize: effects, resistance mechanisms, and management. a review,” Agronomy for Sustainable Development, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 461–481, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. B. Hani, E. D. A. Ramamneh, M. Haddad, A. R. A. Tawaha, and Y. A. Satari, “The impact of cattle manure on the content of major mineral and nitrogen uptake from ¹⁵N isotope-labeled ammonium sulphate fertilizer in maize (Zea mays L.) plants,” Pakistan Journal of Botany, vol. 51, pp. 185–189, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. N. Kimenyu, N. Oyarom, J. S. Chacham, and M. K. Tsanuo, “The potential of Commelina bengalensis, Amaranthus hybridus, Zea mays for phytoremediation of heavy metals from contaminated soils,” Sains Malaysiana, vol. 38, pp. 61–68, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
G. Mathe-Gaspar and A. Anton, “Phytoremediation study: factors influencing heavy metal uptake of plants,” Acta Biologica Szegediensis, vol. 49, pp. 69-70, 2005.
View at: Google Scholar
M. A. Bashir, M. Naveed, Z. Ahmad, B. Gao, A. Mustafa, and A. Núñez-Delgado, “Combined application of biochar and sulfur regulated growth, physiological, antioxidant responses and Cr removal capacity of maize (Zea mays L.) in tannery polluted soils,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 259, Article ID 110051, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Adegbe, I. Eneji, T. Aboiyar, and R. Wuana, “Modelling of heavy metals concentration in maize (Zea may L.) grown in artificially contaminated soil,” Asian Journal of Physical and Chemical Sciences, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 1–13, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. K. Sairam, K. V. Rao, and G. C. Srivastava, “Differential response of wheat genotypes to long term salinity stress in relation to oxidative stress, antioxidant activity and osmolyte concentration,” Plant Science, vol. 163, no. 5, pp. 1037–1046, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. N. Giannopolitis and S. K. Ries, “Superoxide dismutases,” Plant Physiology, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 309–314, 1977.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Aebi, “Catalase in vitro,” Methods in Enzymology, vol. 105, pp. 121–126, 1984.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
US Salinity Laboratory Staff, “Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils,” in Agriculture Handbook, United States Salinity Laboratory, USDA, Washington DC, USA, 1954.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Ryan, “Soil and plant analysis in Mediterranean region: limitations and potential,” Communication in Soil Science and Plant Analaysis, vol. 31, pp. 2147–2154, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
R. G. D. Steel, J. H. Torrie, and D. A. Dickey, Principles and Procedures of Statistics, A Biometrical Approach, McGraw Hill Book Co., New York, NY, USA, 3rd edition, 1997.
T. Akhtar, M. Zia-ur-Rehman, A. Naeem et al., “Photosynthesis and growth response of maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids exposed to cadmium stress,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 5521–5529, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Jiang, C. Zu, J. Shen, T. Li, and L. Tian, “Effects of selenium on the growth and photosynthetic characteristics of flue-cured tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.),” Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 71–77, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. S. Dhillon and S. K. Dhillon, “Accumulation and distribution of selenium in some vegetable crops grown in selenate-Se treated clay loam soil,” Frontiers of Agriculture in China, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 366–373, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. J. Ramos, V. Faquin, L. R. G. Guilherme et al., “Selenium biofortification and antioxidant activity in lettuce plants fed with selenate and selenite,” Plant, Soil and Environment, vol. 56, no. 12, pp. 584–588, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Chen, X. Zhang, Y. Liu et al., “Hemin-mediated alleviation of zinc, lead and chromium toxicity is associated with elevated photosynthesis, antioxidative capacity; suppressed metal uptake and oxidative stress in rice seedlings,” Plant Growth Regulation, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 253–264, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Naveed, A. Mustafa, S. Majeed et al., “Enhancing cadmium tolerance and pea plant health through enterobacter sp. MN17 inoculation together with biochar and gravel sand,” Plants, vol. 9, no. 4, p. 530, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Sabir, M. Naveed, M. A. Bashir et al., “Cadmium mediated phytotoxic impacts in Brassica napus: managing growth, physiological and oxidative disturbances through combined use of biochar and Enterobacter sp. MN17,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 265, Article ID 110522, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Seppänen, M. Turakainen, and H. Hartikainen, “Selenium effects on oxidative stress in potato,” Plant Science, vol. 165, no. 2, pp. 311–319, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Noreen and M. Ashraf, “Alleviation of adverse effects of salt stress on sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) by exogenous application of salicylic acid: growth and photosynthesis,” Pakistan Journal of Botany, vol. 40, pp. 1657–1663, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
E. H. Siddiqi, M. Ashraf, M. Hussain, and A. Jamil, “Assessment of intercultivar variation for salt tolerance in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) using gas exchange characteristics as selection criteria,” Pakistan Journal of Botany, vol. 41, pp. 2251–2259, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
G. H. Abbasi, J. Akhtar, M. Anwar-ul-Haq et al., “Morpho-physiological and micrographic characterization of maize hybrids under NaCl and Cd stress,” Plant Growth Regulation, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 115–122, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. H. Raza, H. U. R. Athar, and M. Ashraf, “Influence of exogenously applied glycinebetaine on the photosynthetic capacity of two differently adapted wheat cultivars under salt stress,” Pakistan Journal of Botany, vol. 38, pp. 341–351, 2006.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Arfan, H. R. Athar, and M. Ashraf, “Does exogenous application of salicylic acid through the rooting medium modulate growth and photosynthetic capacity in two differently adapted spring wheat cultivars under salt stress?” Journal of Plant Physiology, vol. 164, no. 6, pp. 685–694, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Becvort-Azcurra, L. O. Fuentes-Lara, A. Benavides-Mendoza, H. Ramírez, V. Robledo-Torres, and M. D. L. N. Rodríguez-Mendoza, “Aplicación de Selenio en Tomate: crecimiento, Productividad y Estado Antioxidante del Fruto,” Terra Latinoamericana, vol. 30, pp. 291–301, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
R. G. Castillo-Godina, R. Foroughbakhch-Pournavab, and A. Benavides-Mendoza, “Effect of selenium on elemental concentration and antioxidant enzymatic activity of tomato plants,” Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, vol. 18, pp. 233–244, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. X. Xia, S. Q. Liu, H. Li, and X. W. Chen, “Effects of selenium on physiological characteristics, selenium content and quality of garlic,” Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, vol. 18, pp. 733–741, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
F. Nawaz, R. Ahmad, M. Y. Ashraf, E. A. Waraich, and S. Z. Khan, “Effect of selenium foliar spray on physiological and biochemical processes and chemical constituents of wheat under drought stress,” Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, vol. 113, pp. 191–200, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Habibi, “Effect of drought stress and selenium spraying on photosynthesis and antioxidant activity of spring barley,” Acta Agriculture Slovenica, vol. 101, pp. 31–39, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Han, X. Li, S. Xiong et al., “Selenium uptake, speciation and stressed response of Nicotiana tabacum L,” Environmental and Experimental Botany, vol. 95, pp. 6–14, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Zhang, S. Tang, X. Huang et al., “Selenium uptake, dynamic changes in selenium content and its influence on photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence in rice (Oryza sativa L.),” Environmental and Experimental Botany, vol. 107, pp. 39–45, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Naseem, M. Anwar-ul-Haq, J. Akhtar, and M. J. Jaskani, “Effect of exogenous application of salicylic acid and sodium nitroprusside on maize under selenium stress,” Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Science, vol. 57, pp. 150–158, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
M. R. Broadley, J. Alcock, J. Alford et al., “Selenium biofortification of high-yielding winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) by liquid or granular Se fertilisation,” Plant and Soil, vol. 332, no. 1-2, pp. 5–18, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. A. Sajedi, M. R. Ardakani, H. Madani, A. Naderi, and M. Miransari, “The effects of selenium and other micronutrients on the antioxidant activities and yield of corn (Zea mays L.) under drought stress,” Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 215–222, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Longchamp, M. Castrec-Rouelle, P. Biron, and T. Bariac, “Variations in the accumulation, localization and rate of metabolization of selenium in mature Zea mays plants supplied with selenite or selenate,” Food Chemistry, vol. 182, pp. 128–135, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Nawaz, M. Naeem, M. Y. Ashraf et al., “Selenium supplementation affects physiological and biochemical processes to improve fodder yield and quality of maize (Zea mays L.) under water deficit conditions,” Frontier in Plant Science, vol. 7, p. 1438, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2021 Munaza Naseem et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies