Analysis of Volatiles of Rose Pepper Fruits by GC/MS: Drying Kinetics, Essential Oil Yield, and External Color Analysis
Table 7
Essential oils composition of rose pepper fruits, expressed in relative percentage.
N
Compound
RT (min)
LRI 1
LRI 2
Rose pepper fruits essential oil relative %3
Fresh
35°C
55°C
65°C
75°C
1
α-Pinene
11.29
940
932
21 ± 1d
20.7±0.2d
57 ± 1a
27 ± 1c
37 ± 2b
2
Sabinene
13.04
976
969
0.868 ± 0.003
0.9 ± 0.1
0.355 ± 0.002
0.47 ± 0.01
1.2 ± 0.1
3
β-Pinene
13.31
982
974
5.16 ± 0.03
6.6 ± 0.2
1.57 ± 0.03
4.3 ± 0.3
7.7±0.2
4
β-Myrcene
14.02
996
988
3.7 ± 0.1
3.41 ± 0.04
2.7 ± 0.1
3.79 ± 0.03
2.3 ± 0.2
5
α-Phellandrene
14.68
1009
1002
0.135 ± 0.01
−
0.64 ± 0.02
0.21 ± 0.01
−
6
δ-3-Carene
14.77
1011
1010
12.8±0.5c
11.2±0.3d
11.07±0.05d
17 ± 1a
15 ± 1b
7
cis-Ocimene
15.07
1017
1032
29 ± 2a
27.9±1.1a
6.6±0.5c
15.3±0.1b
3.3±0.2d
8
p-Cymene
15.70
1029
1025
4±0.1c
2.6±0.1e
7.1±0.1a
4.69±0.03b
3.4±0.1d
9
Limonene
16.01
1035
1024
8 ± 1b
8 ± 1b
9 ± 1b
8.6±0.05c
11 ± 1a
10
Terpinolene
18.64
1088
1086
0.517 ± 0.0004
0.82 ± 0.01
0.143 ± 0.001
0.8 ± 0.1
0.35 ± 0.01
11
α-Pinene oxide
19.23
1099
1096
0.186 ± 0.004
0.19 ± 0.02
0.69 ± 0.03
0.19 ± 0.01
0.2 ± 0.02
12
cis-p-Mentha-2,8-dien-1-ol
19.76
1110
1102
0.14 ± 0.01
0.085 ± 0.005
0.9 ± 0.1
0.32 ± 0.02
0.38 ± 0.03
13
trans-Verbenol
21.58
1147
1140
0.337 ± 0.005
0.061 ± 0.002
0.4 ± 0.01
0.45 ± 0.02
0.25 ± 0.01
14
Sabinol
21.78
1151
1142
0.15 ± 0.02
0.135 ± 0.002
0.6 ± 0.1
0.4073 ± 0.0001
0.31 ± 0.01
15
Terpinen-4-ol
23.28
1182
1174
0.157 ± 0.002
0.26 ± 0.01
−
0.32 ± 0.01
0.43 ± 0.02
16
α-Terpineol
23.52
1187
1186
0.26 ± 0.01
0.102 ± 0.001
0.9 ± 0.1
0.41 ± 0.02
0.21 ± 0.02
17
p-Cymen-9-ol
23.66
1190
1204
0.26 ± 0.02
0.19 ± 0.01
0.3 ± 0.1
0.4 ± 0.01
0.151 ± 0.005
18
Verbenone
24.36
1204
1205
0.91 ± 0.03
0.6 ± 0.04
0.94 ± 0.05
1.01 ± 0.02
0.52 ± 0.03
19
Eucarvone
24.64
1210
1243
0.71 ± 0.01
0.33 ± 0.02
0.18 ± 0.03
0.5 ± 0.04
0.18 ± 0.01
20
Hydroxycitronellol
31.12
1353
1359
0.46 ± 0.01
0.26 ± 0.01
0.71 ± 0.02
0.36 ± 0.04
0.044 ± 0.003
21
α-Ylangene
32.06
1374
1373
0.22 ± 0.03
0.15 ± 0.02
0.28 ± 0.02
0.29 ± 0.02
0.25 ± 0.02
22
β-Elemene
32.69
1389
1389
0.54 ± 0.01
0.686 ± 0.006
0.383 ± 0.005
0.614 ± 0.007
0.33 ± 0.03
23
α-Gurjunene
33.36
1404
1409
0.23 ± 0.01
0.33 ± 0.01
−
0.35 ± 0.01
0.25 ± 0.02
24
β-Caryophyllene
33.94
1418
1417
2.24 ± 0.15
3.1 ± 0.1
1.74 ± 0.03
2.8 ± 0.1
2.9 ± 0.16
25
ƴ-Elemene
34.34
1428
1434
0.32 ± 0.03
0.6 ± 0.03
0.8 ± 0.1
0.88 ± 0.04
0.91 ± 0.02
26
Humulene
35.35
1452
1436
0.254 ± 0.001
0.37 ± 0.04
0.28 ± 0.01
0.5 ± 0.1
0.47 ± 0.04
27
α-Humulene
35.46
1455
1454
0.39 ± 0.01
0.72 ± 0.05
0.09 ± 0.01
0.24 ± 0.01
0.37 ± 0.01
28
Germacrene D
36.44
1479
1480
0.79 ± 0.04
1.65 ± 0.05
0.113 ± 0.003
1.45 ± 0.05
3.76 ± 0.23
29
α-Muurolene
37.17
1496
1500
0.262 ± 0.003
0.31 ± 0.03
0.17 ± 0.01
0.35 ± 0.02
0.93 ± 0.05
30
ƴ-Cadinene
37.70
1510
1513
0.18 ± 0.02
0.21 ± 0.02
0.145 ± 0.002
0.3 ± 0.02
0.29 ± 0.03
31
δ-Cadinene
37.97
1517
1523
1.06 ± 0.01
1.38 ± 0.01
0.2585 ± 0.0001
1.1 ± 0.1
1.2 ± 0.1
32
Elemol
39.20
1548
1548
2.2 ± 0.1
3.1 ± 0.1
1.1 ± 0.1
2 ± 0.1
0.85 ± 0.01
33
Spatulenol
40.22
1574
1576
0.28 ± 0.01
0.32 ± 0.03
0.25 ± 0.02
0.27 ± 0.01
0.43 ± 0.01
34
Caryophyllene oxide
40.36
1578
1582
0.75 ± 0.03
0.72 ± 0.03
0.54 ± 0.02
0.9 ± 0.1
0.4 ± 0.01
35
ƴ-Eudesmol
42.28
1628
1632
0.26 ± 0.02
0.494 ± 0.005
0.567 ± 0.001
0.41 ± 0.01
0.37 ± 0.01
36
Alloaromadendrene oxide
42.85
1643
1641
0.095 ± 0.004
0.227 ± 0.004
0.6 ± 0.1
0.36 ± 0.02
0.546 ± 0.004
37
β-Eudesmol
43.16
1652
1650
1.26 ± 0.02
1.23 ± 0.03
0.151 ± 0.001
1.3 ± 0.01
0.69 ± 0.04
38
Dihydroeudesmol
43.27
1655
1658
0.09 ± 0.01
−
0.37 ± 0.01
0.21 ± 0.01
0.13 ± 0.01
Monoterpene hydrocarbons
85 ± 5a
82±2a
87 ± 2a
82 ± 2a
82 ± 5a
Oxygen-containing monoterpenes
3.4±0.1c
2±0.1d
5±0.4a
4.2±0.2b
2.5±0.1e
Sesquiterpene hydrocarbons
7.3±0.3c
10.5±0.4b
5.4±0.2d
10.1±0.6b
13 ± 1a
Oxygen-containing sesquiterpenes
4.1±0.2b
5.1±0.2a
2.4±0.1c
4.2±0.1b
2.5±0.1c
1LRI: linear retention index determined on a DB-5 MS fused-silica column relative to a series of n-alkanes (C8–C40). 2Linear retention index reported in the literature (Adams, 2017). 3Relative % is given as mean ± SD, n = 3. Equal letters do not differ by the Tukey or Tahmane T2 tests, at a 5% significance level.