Research Article
Optimisation of Malting Parameters for Quinoa and Barley: Application of Response Surface Methodology
Table 5
A central composite design (CCD) for quinoa malting using response surface methodology.
| Std | Run | Block | Steeping time (hrs) | Germination time (hrs) | Brix (°Bx) | FAN (mg/L) | Diastatic power (°L) |
| 1 | 12 | Block 1 | 12.00 | 24.00 | 6.23 | 124.40 | 152.40 | 2 | 9 | Block 1 | 48.00 | 24.00 | 8.06 | 162.40 | 261.50 | 3 | 10 | Block 1 | 12.00 | 96.00 | 6.50 | 129.60 | 158.00 | 4 | 13 | Block 1 | 48.00 | 96.00 | 8.09 | 163.00 | 265.30 | 5 | 8 | Block 1 | 4.54 | 60.00 | 3.17 | 99.50 | 134.90 | 6 | 7 | Block 1 | 55.46 | 60.00 | 8.11 | 165.60 | 268.70 | 7 | 11 | Block 1 | 30.00 | 9.09 | 7.10 | 122.10 | 162.10 | 8 | 2 | Block 1 | 30.00 | 110.91 | 8.05 | 153.80 | 260.00 | 9 | 1 | Block 1 | 30.00 | 60.00 | 8.03 | 144.20 | 211.90 | 10 | 5 | Block 1 | 30.00 | 60.00 | 8.00 | 143.40 | 218.90 | 11 | 6 | Block 1 | 30.00 | 60.00 | 8.03 | 145.30 | 216.60 | 12 | 4 | Block 1 | 30.00 | 60.00 | 7.95 | 144.50 | 215.30 | 13 | 3 | Block 1 | 30.00 | 60.00 | 7.97 | 143.20 | 213.60 |
|
|