Research Article

Using Response Surface Methodology to Optimize Edible Coating Formulations to Delay Ripening and Preserve Postharvest Quality of Tomatoes

Table 1

Center composite design (CCD) and experimental data obtained for the response variables studied.

RunIndependent variablesRR (%)Chl a (μg/g)Fir (N)TFC (μg/ml)TA (%)
CPE (kg/l)CGA (%)Time (min)

T10.8353046.677.023.9159.640.275
T20.83151053.335.474.0074.580.352
T30.83153040.007.804.0078.790.291
T40.5153046.675.573.7786.040.293
T50.8351046.676.153.9376.470.293
T60.5151070.006.973.9861.110.298
T70.51151066.678.373.9337.450.283
T8C0.67102036.678.374.0040.920.278
T90.51153036.679.843.7651.440.259
T10C0.67102035.268.203.9940.890.276
T11C0.67102037.368.603.9740.290.279
T12C0.67102035.468.824.0040.790.272
T130.670.9552036.673.653.8649.540.299
T140.67101.9163.336.554.0064.900.345
T15C0.67102036.568.684.0040.120.279
T160.381102050.0011.983.9057.850.26
T170.6719.052040.009.384.0039.440.305
T18C0.67102035.768.483.9940.610.271
T190.671038.0933.338.303.7567.060.300
T200.959102046.677.634.0072.690.292

CPE: concentration of water/ethanol pineapple peel extract, CGA: concentration of gum Arabic, C: center point, RR: ripening rate, Fir: firmness, TFC: total flavonoid content, TA: titratable acidity, Chl a: chlorophyll a.