Research Article
Deep Learning-Based CT Imaging in Diagnosing Myeloma and Its Prognosis Evaluation
Table 1
Comparison of baseline data between the two groups.
| Project | Group 1 (n = 128) | Group 2 (n = 58) | Statistics | |
| Age (year) | 58.93 ± 9.65 | 57.69 ± 11.12 | t = 0.771 | 0.441 | Height (m) | 1.66 ± 0.08 | 1.65 ± 0.10 | t = 0.453 | 0.652 | Weight (kg) | 67.52 ± 10.51 | 66.85 ± 11.86 | t = 0.317 | 0.752 | Gender (n/%) | Male | 69/53.91 | 24/41.38 | χ2 = 0.839 | 0.334 | Female | 59/46.09 | 34/58.62 | DS staging (n/%) | I | 3/2.34 | 4/6.90 | χ2 = 0.873 | 0.467 | II | 9/7.03 | 4/6.90 | III | 2/1.56 | 1/1.72 | IV | 9372.66 | 39/67.24 | V | 20/15.63 | 9/15.52 | ISS staging (n/%) | I | 17/13.28 | 10/17.24 | χ2 = 0.797 | 0.562 | II | 54/42.19 | 22/37.93 | III | 52/40.63 | 22/37.93 | IV | 0/0.00 | 0/0.00 | V | 1/0.78 | 0/0.00 |
|
|