Research Article

Evaluation of Time Consumption for Debonding Brackets Using Different Techniques: A Hospital-Based Study

Table 2

Tukey’s multiple comparison test for the time taken between the four different debonding methods.

Method (I)Method (J)Mean difference (I-J) value95% confidence interval
Lower boundUpper bound

USDP0.034500.990−0.25880.3278
LC0.472500.0010.17920.7658
TM−0.127500.665−0.42080.1658

DPUS−0.034500.990−0.32780.2588
LC0.438000.0010.14470.7313
TM−0.162000.472−0.45530.1313

LCUS−0.472500.001−0.7658−0.1792
DP−0.438000.001−0.7313−0.1447
TM−0.600000.001−0.8933−0.3067

TMUS0.127500.665−0.16580.4208
DP0.162000.472−0.13130.4553
LC0.600000.0010.30670.8933

US: ultrasonic scaler; DP: debonding plier; LC: ligature cutter; TN: thermal method. The mean difference is significant as the p value < 0.05.