Research Article
Morphological Reconstruction-Based Image-Guided Fuzzy Clustering with a Novel Impact Factor
Table 2
The ASA of tested algorithms on SF images with various noises.
| Noise | FCM | FCM_S1 | FCM_S2 | FCM + GF | IFCM_GF | FRFCM | MRIFCM_GF |
| 3% Gaussian | 0.7277 | 0.9716 | 0.9736 | 0.7333 | 0.9274 (0.02) | 0.9972 | 0.9986 (0.019) | 5% Gaussian | 0.6417 | 0.9301 | 0.9271 | 0.6486 | 0.7492 (0.04) | 0.9952 | 0.9979 (0.016) | 10% Gaussian | 0.5392 | 0.8103 | 0.8003 | 0.5250 | 0.6132 (0.002) | 0.9857 | 0.9944 (0.004) | 15% Gaussian | 0.4902 | 0.7331 | 0.7348 | 0.4709 | 0.5620 (0.015) | 0.9592 | 0.9847 (0.001) | 10% Salt & Pepper | 0.9233 | 0.9329 | 0.9746 | 0.9273 | 0.9995 (0.003) | 0.9990 | 0.9994 (0.007) | 20% Salt & Pepper | 0.8475 | 0.8617 | 0.9477 | 0.8620 | 0.9989 (0.002) | 0.9982 | 0.9989 (0.005) | 30% Salt & Pepper | 0.7708 | 0.7613 | 0.9152 | 0.7958 | 0.9973 (0.001) | 0.9966 | 0.9975 (0.003) |
|
|
The best segmentation accuracy among the group. |