Research Article
Effect of Different Anesthesia Methods on Emergence Agitation and Related Complications in Postoperative Patients with Osteosarcoma
Figure 3
Comparison of CVP between the two groups (‾x ± s). The horizontal axis indicates the time points and the vertical axis indicated the CVP level in cmH2O. The CVP of the control group at T0, T1, T2, T3, and T4 was (8.46 ± 0.37), (7.97 ± 0.46), (8.23 ± 0.65), (8.25 ± 0.92), and (8.71 ± 0.38), respectively. The CVP of the experimental group at T0, T1, T2, T3, and T4 was (8.48 ± 0.38), (8.26 ± 0.35), (8.25 ± 0.37), (8.32 ± 0.34), and (8.44 ± 0.33), respectively. from left to right indicates that the differences in CVP at T1 and T4 between the two groups were significant (t = 3.8088, 4.0704, , ). & indicates that the difference in CVP at T0 and T1 within the control group was significant (t = 6.2998, ). && indicates that the difference in CVP at T1 and T2 within the control group was significant (t = 2.4721, ). &&& indicates that the difference in CVP at T0 and T4 within the control group was significant (t = 3.5737, ).