Research Article
The Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Enhanced CT Combined with Tumor Markers AFP and CA199 in Liver Cancer
Table 3
Comparison of the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and enhanced CT combined with tumor markers AFP and CA199 in liver cancer.
| Method | Sensitivity | Specificity | Accuracy | Positive rate | Negative rate |
| Contrast-enhanced ultrasound | 88.67 (227/256) | 87.27 (96/110) | 88.25 (323/366) | 94.19 (227/241) | 76.80 (96/125) | Enhanced CT | 78.52 (201/256) | 78.18 (86/110) | 78.42 (287/366) | 89.33 (201/225) | 60.99 (86/141) | AFP | 77.73 (199/256) | 80.00 (88/110) | 78.42 (287/366) | 90.05 (199/221) | 60.69 (88/145) | CA199 | 78.13 (200/256) | 70.00 (77/110) | 75.68 (277/366) | 85.84 (200/233) | 57.89 (77/133) | Combined detection | 96.88 (248/256) | 91.82 (101/110) | 95.36 (349/366) | 96.50 (248/257) | 92.66 (101/109) | X2 | 7.614 | 1.335 | 6.143 | 2.012 | 10.467 | value | <0.05 | >0.05 | <0.05 | >0.05 | <0.05 |
|
|
|