Effect of Continuous Care Combined with Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Based on a Continuing Care Health Platform on MBI and FMA Scores of Acute Stroke Patients

Figure 1

Comparison of ADL scores at different times between the two groups ( ± s). Note: the horizontal axis indicates T0, T1, T2, and T3, and the vertical axis indicates the ADL score (points); the ADL scores at T0, T1, T2, and T3 of patients in group A were (31.47 ± 5.64), (44.52 ± 4.87), (53.47 ± 4.63), and (62.59 ± 4.78), respectively; the ADL scores at T0, T1, T2, and T3 of patients in group B were (31.56 ± 5.58), (37.19 ± 4.54), (46.32 ± 4.86), and (55.32 ± 4.61), respectively; indicates that the difference in ADL scores at T1 between the two groups was significant (t = 6.420， < 0.001); indicates that the difference in ADL scores at T2 between the two groups was significant (t = 6.211,  < 0.001); and indicates that the difference in ADL scores at T3 between the two groups was significant (t = 6.383， < 0.001).