Research Article
[Retracted] Clinical Efficacy of Assisted Reproductive Technology Combined with Progesterone Capsules in the Treatment of Infertility Caused by Diminished Ovarian Reserve and Its Influence on Serum FSH, E2, and LH Levels of Patients
Figure 1
Comparison of ovarian-related indexes (Note: in Figure 1, the abscissa was before and after treatment from left to right, respectively. The black area indicated the experimental group, and the gray area indicated the control group. # indicated ). (a) PI. No significant difference was found in PI between both groups before treatment (1.49 ± 0.21 vs 1.50 ± 0.23, ). After treatment, compared with the control group, PI of the experimental group was obviously higher (2.34 ± 0.35 vs 1.87 ± 0.25, ). (b) RI. No significant difference was found in RI between both groups before treatment (0.90 ± 0.11 vs 0.91 ± 0.12, ). After treatment, compared with the control group, RI of the experimental group was obviously lower (0.68 ± 0.10 vs 0.78 ± 0.12, ). (c) OAV. No significant difference was found in OAV between both groups before treatment (3.98 ± 0.35 vs 3.96 ± 0.36, ). After treatment, compared with the control group, OAV of the experimental group was obviously higher (6.05 ± 0.45 vs 5.10 ± 0.45, ). (d) S/D. No significant difference was found in S/D between both groups before treatment (3.00 ± 0.24 vs 3.02 ± 0.28, ). After treatment, compared with the control group, S/D of the experimental group was obviously lower (2.10 ± 0.12 vs 2.58 ± 0.20, ). (e) PSV. No significant difference was found in PSV between both groups before treatment (0.79 ± 0.15 vs 0.78 ± 0.14, ). After treatment, compared with the control group, PSV of the experimental group was obviously higher (2.29 ± 0.20 vs 1.85 ± 0.23, ). (f) Thickness of endometrium. No significant difference was found in the thickness of the endometrium between both groups before treatment (3.55 ± 0.14 vs 3.59 ± 0.15, ). After treatment, compared with the control group, the thickness of the endometrium of the experimental group was obviously higher (5.01 ± 0.26 vs 4.66 ± 0.19, ).
| (a) |
| (b) |
| (c) |
| (d) |
| (e) |
| (f) |