Review Article

Virtual Reality and Cardiac Diseases: A Systematic Review of Applications and Effects

Table 3

General characteristics of included studies.

Author, yearCountryJournalTarget groupType of VR applicationIntervention group/control groupSample sizeDetail of groups (sex, age)Session detailMeasured outcomeOutcome

Jozwik et al., 2022 [24]PolandHealthcarePatients with CHDPsychological rehabilitationCR + VR vs CR + schultz autogenic trainingN = 34
VR+
CR = 11
CG = 23
Sex: 34 M
Age
CG: 62.52 ± 7.18
EG: 66.55 ± 9.63
2 times a week for 4 weeks(i) Anxiety level
(ii) Depression level
(iii) Emotional tension level
(iv) External stress level
(v) Intrapsychic stress level
(vi) Risk of lying
This study verified that VR leads to an improvement in the mental state of the patients

Szczepanska-Gierachaet al., 2021 [25]PolandCyberpsychology, behavior, and social networkingPatients with CADPsychological rehabilitationCR + VR vs CR + schultz autogenic trainingN = 32
VR+
CR = 15
CG = 17
Sex
EG: 9 F, 6 M
CG: 11 F, 6 M
Age
CG: 68.41 ± 5.06
EG: 69.47 ± 7.54
2 times a week for 4 weeks(i) Anxiety level
(ii) Depression level
(iii) Emotional tension level
(iv) External stress level
(v) Intrapsychic stress level
(vi) Risk of lying
This study confirmed that VR leads to an improvement in the mental state of the patients

Ribeiro et al., 2021 [26]BrazilPhysiotherapy research internationalPatients undergoing CABGPhysical rehabilitationVR vs control group and EMGN = 48
VR = 17
EMG = 15
CG = 16
Sex
CG: 4 F, 11 M
EMG: 2 F, 13 M
VR: 7 F, 10 M
Age
CG: 60.3 ± 8.3
EMG: 58.3 ± 7.7
VR: 62.1 ± 9.0
Not clear(i) Heart rate variability
(ii) Time of discharge of hospital
Physiotherapy protocols, combined with VR training, improved a higher number of indicator indices and a shorter hospital stay after surgery

Patel et al., 2021 [27]USAThe international journal of cardiovascular imagingMedical students, residents, fellows, nurses, advanced practitioners, junior attending physicians, dieticians, and bioengineering PhD studentsAnatomy educationVR vs a desktop computer interfaceN = 51
VR = 24
CG = 27
Sex
CG: 18 F, 9 M
VR: 16 F, 8 M
Age
CG: 30
VR: 28
Not mentioned(i) Visuospatial knowledgeThere was no statistically significant difference between VR and the control group

Laghlam et al., 2021 [28]FranceAnnals of intensive carePatients undergoing cardiac surgeryPsychological rehabilitationVR vs kalinoxN = 180
VR: 90
CG90
Sex
CG: 18 F, 72 M
VR: 28 F, 62 M
Age
CG: 68
VR: 68
5 min before the removal of the drains, and was continued for 10 min after(i) Pain level
(ii) Anxiety level
Although VR was well tolerated by patients and allowed a satisfying self-reported anxiety control, it failed to confirm noninferiority compared to Kalinox® for controlling pain and anxiety

Keshvari et al., 2021 [16]IranEgyptian heart journalPatients undergoing coronary angiographyPhysical rehabilitation/psychological rehabilitationVR vs usual careN = 80
VR = 40
CG = 40
Sex
CG: 15 F, 25 M
VR: 8 F, 32 M
Age
CG: 52.08 ± 4.002
VR: 50.95 ± 4.120
5 min for each patient(i) Anxiety level
(ii) Heart rate
(iii) Respiratory rate
(iv) Blood pressure
VR distraction was effective in reducing anxiety before coronary artery angiography

Jozwik et al., 2021 [29]PolandJournal of clinical medicinePatients with CADPsychological rehabilitationCR + VR vs CR + schultz autogenic trainingN = 77
VR = 28
CG = 49
Sex
CG: 25 F, 24 M
VR: 17 F, 11 M
Age
CG: 63.96 ± 6.89
VR: 66.00 ± 9.73
8 sessions, 3 times a week(i) Anxiety level
(ii) Depression level
(iii) General stress level
(iv) Emotional tension level
(v) External stress level
(vi) Intrapsychic stress level
The virtual environment with standard CR leads to a significant improvement in patients’ mental health

Jozwik et al., 2021 [30]PolandMedicinaPatients with IHDPsychological rehabilitationCR + VR vs CR + schultz autogenic trainingN = 43
VR+
CR = 17
CG = 26
Sex
CG: 26 F
VR: 17 F
Age
CG: 65.23 ± 6.49
VR: 65.65 ± 10.07
3 times a week for 8 weeks(i) Generalized stress level
(ii) Emotional tension level
(iii) External stress level
(iv) Intrapsychic stress level
(v) Depression level
(vi) Anxiety level
VR therapy is an efficient and interesting supplement to cardiac rehabilitation, with proven efficacy in reducing stress levels

Gulick et al., 2021 [31]USAJournal of medical internet researchPatients undergoing cardiac rehabilitationPhysical rehabilitation/psychological rehabilitationVR vs standard careN = 35
VR = 16
CG = 19
Age: 61 ± 9.9Not clear(i) Knowledge retention
(ii) Patient satisfaction
(iii) Engagement
No improvements were seen in the VR group

da Cruz et al., 2021 [32]BrazilPhysical therapy & rehabilitation journalPatients with cardiovascular diseases or risk factorsPsychological rehabilitationCR + VR vs traditional CRN = 61
VR+
CR = 30
CG = 31
Sex
CG: 7 F, 24 M
VR: 15 F, 15 M
Age
CG: 66.83 ± 10.93
VR: 63.27 ± 12.68
3 times a week for 12 weeks(i) Adherence
(ii) Motivation
(iii) Engagement
Although VR increased program adherence but decreased patient motivation and absorption

Chang et al., 2021 [33]TaiwanJournal of the Chinese medical associationAF patients preparing for ablationAF preprocedural educationVR vs paper-based materialsN = 33
VR = 11
CG = 22
Sex
CG: 8 F, 14 M
VR: 9 F, 2 M
Age
CG: 30–40 (2), 40–50 (4), 50–60 (4), and >60 yrs (12)
VR: 30–40 (0), 40–50 (1), 50–60 (4), and >60 yrs (6)
Not clear(i) Self-efficacy
(ii) Satisfaction
VR decreased periprocedural anxiety and smoothed the procedure of AF catheter ablation

Zinchenko et al., 2020 [34]RussiaNew ideas in psychologyHumanitarian studentsAnatomy educationVR vs paper and 3D interactive model on a computer displayN = 45Sex
CG1: 9 M
CG2: 8 M
VR: 9 M
Age
CG1: 21.2 ± 2.3
CG2: 22.9 ± 3.5
VR: 22.7 ± 3.6
15 min(i) Number of correct answersVR was more efficient than reading texts or interacting with a 3D model on a computer screen

Katz et al., 2020 [35]USAJournal of medical internet researchAnesthesiology residentsACLS trainingVR vs high-fidelity simulationN = 23
VR = 11
CG = 12
Sex: 17 M, 8 F
Age: 25–35
Not clear(i) Technical skills
(ii) Behavioral skills
(iii) Cost
Utilization of a VR-based team leader refresher for ACLS skills is comparable with HFS in several areas, including learner satisfaction

Hessabi, 2020 [36]IranInternational journal of pharmaceutical and phytopharmacological researchPatients admitted to the CCUsPsychological rehabilitationVR vs usual careN = 60
VR = 30
CG = 30
Sex
CG: 15 M, 15 F
VR: 15 M, 15 F
Age
CG: 49.92 ± 7
VR: 52.03 ± 6
On the second and third night of admission for 15 min(i) Anxiety levelVR can effectively reduce anxiety in hospitalized patients in the CCU

García-Bravo et al., 2020 [37]SpainInternational journal of environmental research and public healthPatients with IHDPhysical rehabilitation/psychological rehabilitationCR + VR vs traditional CRN = 20
VR = 10
CG = 10
Age
CG: 53.7 ± 10.30
EG: 48.70 ± 6.66
2 times a week for 8 weeks (60 min)(i) Ergometry
(ii) Metabolic equivalents
(iii) Functional independence measure
(iv) 6MWT
(v) Aerobic capacity and endurance
(vi) Quality of life
(vii) Depression level
(viii) Satisfaction
(ix) Adherence
VR could be incorporated into CR programs

Alves da Cruz et al., 2020 [38]BrazilArchives of physical medicine and rehabilitationPatients with cardiovascular diseases or risk factorsPhysical rehabilitationVR vs regular CRN = 27Sex: 14 M, 13 F
Age: 63.40 ± 12.71
Each VRBT or CR session lasted 85 minutes(i) Heart rate
(ii) Blood pressure
(iii) Respiratory rate
(iv) Rating of perceived exertion
(v) peripheral oxygen saturation
(vi) Heart rate reserve
(vii) How long the patient maintained the prescribed
(viii) HRR
VR produces similar physiological acute hemodynamic effects in CR

Maresky et al., 2019 [39]CanadaClinical anatomyMedical studentsAnatomy educationVR vs independent studyN = 42
VR = 28
CG = 14
Age: 18–3430 min(i) Number of correct answersThis study demonstrates the viability and the effectiveness of VR in teaching cardiac anatomy

Vieira et al., 2018 [40]PortugalDisability and rehabilitation: assistive technologyPatients with CADPhysical rehabilitation/psychological rehabilitationVR vs usual care and paper bookletN = 33
VR = 11
EG2 = 11
CG = 11
Sex: 33 M
Age
EG1: 55 ± 9.0
EG2: 59 ± 11.3
CG: 59 ± 5.8
3 times a week for 6 months(i) Executive function
(ii) Ability to switch information
(iii) Working memory
(iv) Selective attention
(v) Conflict resolution ability
(vi) Quality of life
(vii) Depression level
(viii) Anxiety level
(ix) Stress level
The VR improved attention and conflict resolution ability, revealing the potential of CR, specifically with virtual reality exercise, on executive function

Vieira, 2017 [41]PortugalEuropean journal of integrative medicinePatients with CADPhysical rehabilitationVR vs usual care and paper bookletN = 33
EG2 = 11
CG = 11
Sex: 33 M
Age
EG1: 55 ± 9.0
EG2: 59 ± 11.3
CG: 59 ± 5.8
3 times a week for 6 months(i) Total cholesterol levels
(ii) High-density lipoprotein
(iii) Low-density lipoprotein
(iv) Triglycerides
(v) Lean mass
(vi) Body mass index
(vii) Body fat at the trunk
(viii) Total body fat
(ix) Waist-to-height ratio
VR had a positive effect on body composition

Voelker et al., 2016 [42]GermanyJournal of interventional cardiologyCardiology fellowsCardiac catheterization trainingVR vs lecturesN = 18
VR = 9
CG = 9
Not mentioned7.5 hours(i) Participant’s performance quality
(ii) Procedure time
(iii) Fluoroscopy time
VR simulation training improved the performance level of cardiology fellows

Valdis et al., 2015 [43]CanadaInnovations-technology and techniques in cardiothoracic and vascular surgerySurgical traineesRobotic cardiac surgery trainingVR vs no trainingN = 19
VR = 9
CG = 10
Sex
CG: 6 M, 4 F
VR: 8 M, 2 F
Age
CG: 29.9 ± 2.4
VR: 32.7 ± 6.1
The average duration of VR: 9.3 hours(i) Standardized robotic internal thoracic artery harvest
(ii) Mitral valve annuloplasty
VR can significantly improve the efficiency and quality of learning in robotic cardiac surgery

Khanal et al., 2014 [44]USAJournal of biomedical informaticsCare providersACLS trainingVR vs traditional ACLS trainingN = 148Sex: 10 M, 138 F30 minutes(i) Time for each taskVR-based ACLS training can provide a learning experience similar to face-to-face training

Cacau et al., 2013 [45]BrazilRevista brasileira de cirurgia cardiovascularPatients in the postoperative periodPhysical rehabilitation/psychological rehabilitationVR vs conventional physical therapyN = 60
VR = 30
CG = 30
Sex
CG: 16 M, 14 F
VR: 13 M, 17 F
Age
CG: 52 ± 2.4
VR: 49.2 ± 2.6
Twice a day(i) Functional performance
(ii) 6MWT
(iii) Length of hospitalization
(iv) Functional independence measure
(v) Quality of life
Adjunctive treatment with VR demonstrated better functional performance in patients

Bagai et al., 2012 [46]CanadaCirculation-cardiovascular interventionsCardiology traineesCardiac catheterization trainingVR vs apprenticeship-based trainingN = 27
VR = 11
CG = 15
Sex
CG: 13 M, 2 F
VR: 5 M, 6 F
Age
CG: 31
VR: 29
Not mentioned(i) Mounting the catheter on the guidewire
(ii) Cannulating the coronary arteries exchanging catheters
(iii) Obtaining and interpreting standard angiographic views
(iv) Overall assessment of wire catheter skills
(v) Time, efficiency, and ability to complete the case
(vi) Need for verbal prompts
(vii) Attending take over
Skills required to perform cardiac catheterization can be learned via mentored simulation training

Chuang et al., 2006 [47]TaiwanPhysical therapyPatients undergoing CABGPhysical rehabilitationVR vs usual rehabilitationN = 20
VR = 10
CG = 10
Sex: 20 M
Age
CG: 63.70 ± 10.03
VR: 65.70 ± 14.48
2 times a week for about 3 months (30 min)(i) Heart rate
(ii) VO2max
(iii) Treadmill grades and speeds
(iv) Blood pressure
This study showed a powerful effect of VR on the progress of cardiac rehabilitation

Chuang et al., 2005 [48]TaiwanArchives of physical medicine and rehabilitationPatients undergoing CABGPhysical rehabilitationVR vs usual rehabilitationN = 32
VR = 17
CG = 15
Sex
CG: 13 M, 2 F
VR: 15 M, 2 F
Age
CG: 68.67 ± 12.32
VR: 64.41 ± 7.66
2 times a week for about 3 months (30 min)(i) Heart rate
(ii) Blood pressure
(iii) Rating of perceived exertion
(iv) VO2max
Treadmill training enhanced by VR was superior to conventional exercise protocols for post-CABG patients

CHD: coronary heart disease; CR: cardiac rehabilitation; CG: control group; EG: experimental group; CAD: coronary artery disease; CABG: coronary artery bypass graft; EMG: early mobilization group; IHD: ischemic heart disease; AF: atrial fibrillation; ACLS: advanced cardiac life support; HFS: high-fidelity simulation; CCU: cardiac care unit; 6MWT: 6-minute walk test; VRBT: virtual reality-based therapy.