Clinical Study

Treatment of Antibody-Mediated Renal Allograft Rejection: Improving Step by Step

Table 2

HLA mismatches and HLA antibodies.

Group RLP
()
Group BLP
()
Group BHP
()

Number of HLA mismatches per patient (mean ± SD)
 Class I (A, B)2.2 ± 1.22.0 ± 1.32.7 ± 0.9n.s.
 Class II (DR, DQ)1.7 ± 0.92.5 ± 1.12.0 ± 1.2n.s.
HLA antibody panel reactivity (% PRA) at diagnosis (mean ± SD)
 Class I85 ± 1450 ± 3041 ± 20n.s.
 Class II66 ± 2063 ± 1963 ± 28n.s.
MFI (mean ± SD)
 At diagnosis8539 ± 54789747 ± 83638467 ± 6876n.s.
 After treatment8196 ± 54257891 ± 64755221 ± 4711n.s.
MFI (mean ± SD)
 At diagnosis11,235 ± 10,11612,937 ± 11,19610,657 ± 8973n.s.
 After treatment12,900 ± 11,01812,653 ± 12,7445587 ± 4509n.s.
Patients with a decrease of [% (count)]
 DSAmax33% (4)72% (8)82% (9)0.036 (group BHP versus RLP)
 DSAmax < 500 MFI8% (1)9% (1)18% (2)n.s.
 DSAsum33% (4)72% (8)72% (8)n.s.

Group RLP, rituximab + low-dose IVIG + plasmapheresis; group BLP, bortezomib + low-dose IVIG + plasmapheresis; group BHP, bortezomib + high-dose IVIG + plasmapheresis. , donor-specific HLA antibody showing the highest mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) at time of diagnosis. n.s., not significant. in comparison to before treatment. in comparison to before treatment.