Research Article

Diagnostic Value of CD25, CD69, and CD134 on Tuberculosis-Specific Antigen-Stimulated CD4+ T Cells for Tuberculous Pleurisy

Table 4

Comparison of diagnostic efficacy of PF and PB in the diagnosis of TP.

VariablesAUC
(95% CI)
Youden
Indicator
Cutoff
value
Sensitivity
(95% CI)
Specificity
(95% CI)
PPV
(95% CI)
NPV
(95% CI)
Accuracy (%)

PF
 CD25+0.93
(0.86–1.00)
0.91.992.9%
(75.1%–98.8)
91.7%
(76.4%–97.8%)
89.7%
(71.5%–97.3%)
94.3%
(79.5%–99.0%)
92.2
 CD69+0.94
(0.87–1.00)
0.853.496.4%
(79.7%–99.8%)
88.9%
(73.0%–96.4%)
87.1%
(69.2%–95.8%)
97.0%
(82.5%–99.8%)
92.2
 CD134+0.95
(0.90–1.00)
0.92.196.4%
(79.8%–99.8%)
88.9%
(73.0%–96.4%)
87.1%
(69.2%–95.8%)
97.0%
(82.5%–99.8%)
92.2
 CD25+CD69+0.92
(0.85–1.00)
0.81.785.7%
(66.4%–95.3%)
91.7%
(76.4%–97.8%)
88.9%
(69.7%–97.1%)
89.2%
(73.6%–96.5%)
89.1
 CD25+CD134+0.95
(0.90–1.00)
0.91.392.9%
(75.0%–98.8%)
91.7%
(76.4%–97.8%)
89.7%
(71.5%–97.3%)
94.3%
(79.5%–99.0%)
92.2
 CD69+CD134+0.90
(0.81–0.99)
0.82.285.7%
(66.4%–95.3%)
91.7%
(76.4%–97.8%)
88.9%
(69.7%–97.1%)
89.2%
(73.6%–96.5%)
89.1
PB
 CD25+0.85
(0.75–0.95)
0.71.185.7%
(66.4%–95.3%)
83.3%
(66.5%–93.0%)
80.0%
(60.9%–91.6%)
88.2%
(71.6%–96.2%)
84.4
 CD69+0.86
(0.76–0.96)
0.72.389.3%
(70.6%–97.2%)
77.8%
(60.4%–89.3%)
75.8%
(57.4%–88.3%)
90.3%
(73.1%–97.5%)
82.8
 CD134+0.86
(0.76–0.96)
0.70.996.4%
(79.8%–99.8%)
75.0%
(57.5%–87.3%)
75.0%
(57.5%–87.3%)
96.4%
(79.8%–99.8%)
84.4
 CD25+CD69+0.85
(0.75–0.95)
0.70.885.7%
(66.4%–95.3%)
83.3%
(66.5%–93.0%)
80.0%
(60.9%–91.6%)
88.2%
(71.6%–96.2%)
84.4
 CD25+CD134+0.87
(0.78–0.96)
0.70.785.7%
(66.4%–95.3%)
86.1%
(69.7%–94.8%)
82.8%
(63.5%–93.5%)
88.6%
(72.3%–96.3%)
85.9
 CD69+CD134+0.87
(0.77–0.97)
0.70.792.9%
(75.0%–98.8%)
80.6%
(63.4%–91.2%)
78.8%
(60.6%–90.4%)
93.6%
(77.2%–98.9%)
85.9

Note: TP (n = 28) = tuberculous pleurisy; PF = pleural fluid; PB = peripheral blood.