Percutaneous Intervention or Bypass Graft for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Table 1

Pooled results of all 43 studies showing comparison of odds ratio with 95% CI for primary and secondary endpoints of PCI vs. CABG for across all follow-up duration.

Event	30 days	1 year	5 years	10 years
MACCE	0.56 (0.42–0.76,  = 0.0002)	1.45 (1.21–1.75,  = <0.0001)	1.67 (1.18–2.36,  = 0.04)	0.68 (0.44–1.06,  = 0.09)
MI	0.81 (0.60–1.09,  = 0.17)	1.33 (1.04–1.70,  = 0.02)	1.67 (1.35–2.06,  = <0.00001)	1.21 (0.67–2.18,  = 0.53)
Revascularization	0.65 (0.38–1.11,  = 0.12)	3.01 (2.40–3.79,  = <0.00001)	2.80 (2.18–3.60,  = <0.00001)	2.95 (0.22–39.28,  = 0.41= 0.41)
Stroke	0.37 (0.19–0.71,  = 0.03)	0.50 (0.37–0.67,  = <0.00001)	0.60 (0.39–0.92,  = 0.02)	0.68 (0.28–1.65,  = 0.39)
All-cause mortality	0.52 (0.30–0.91,  = 0.02)	0.96 (0.76–1.22,  = 0.75)	0.96 (0.78–1.19,  = 0.72)	0.79 (0.60–1.05,  = 0.10)