Utility of Saline-Induced Resting Full-Cycle Ratio Compared with Resting Full-Cycle Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve
Table 1
Baseline characteristics and angiographic findings.
70 lesions
Patients (n)
56
Age (years)
72 ± 9
Male/female (n)
40/16
BMI
23.1 ± 3.4
Hypertension
44 (78.5)
Smoking, ever
36 (64.2)
Dyslipidemia
39 (69.6)
Diabetes mellitus
28 (50.0)
e-GFR (ml/min)
60.7 ± 17.9
Post PCI
22 (39.2)
Angiographical findings of culprit artery (n)
LAD/CX/RCA
37/15/18
Quantitative coronary angiography
Minimum lumen diameter (mm)
1.16 ± 0.53
% diameter stenosis (%)
55.0 ± 16.4
Reference diameter (mm)
3.1 ± 0.71
Lesion types of culprit artery
Focal
40 (57.1)
Diffuse
18 (25.7)
Tandem
12 (17.2)
Deferred lesion
30 (42.8)
Side effect
VF during FFR
1 (1.4)
VF during sRFR
0 (0)
Data are presented as means ± SD or the number (percentage). BMI, body mass index; e-GFR, estimated-glomerular filtration rate; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; LAD, left anterior descending artery; CX, circumflex artery; RCA, right coronary artery; VF, ventricular fibrillation; FFR, fractional flow reserve; sRFR, saline-induced resting full-cycle ratio.
