The Impact of Smoking on Clinical Outcomes after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Women Compared to Men

Mohammadi, Seyyed Saeed; Zibaeenezhad, Mohammad Javad; Sayadi, Mehrab; Khorshidi, Soorena; Hadiyan, Ehsan; Razeghian-Jahromi, Iman

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6619503

Journal of Interventional Cardiology

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 | Article ID 6619503 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6619503

The Impact of Smoking on Clinical Outcomes after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Women Compared to Men

Seyyed Saeed Mohammadi,¹Mohammad Javad Zibaeenezhad,¹Mehrab Sayadi,¹Soorena Khorshidi,¹Ehsan Hadiyan,¹and Iman Razeghian-Jahromi¹

Academic Editor: Patrizia Presbitero

Received11 Oct 2020

Revised24 Feb 2021

Accepted10 Mar 2021

Published16 Mar 2021

Abstract

Background. For decades, cardiovascular diseases (CVD) have been known as men’s disease. However, recent research studies showed that they have become more common in women. Smoking is a strong risk factor for CVD especially that of coronary artery disease (CAD). Several studies reported that women are more susceptible to drastic sequels of smoking than men. There is limited data regarding the impact of smoking on post-revascularization clinical events stratified by gender. This study aimed to investigate if gender significantly changes the incidence of adverse clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) among those with history of smoking. Methods. Participants were selected from two hospitals from 2003 to 2019. Among patients who had PCI (index PCI), those with stable CAD who underwent elective PCI were included. Exclusion criteria were defined as primary PCI and those with multiple prior revascularizations. Participants were followed up seeking for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) including revascularization (PCI or coronary artery bypass grafting), myocardial infarction, and coronary death in three time intervals according to the time of index PCI (short term: up to 24 hours, mid-term: 24 hours to less than 6 months, and long term: more than 6 months). Results. Of the 1799 patients, 61% were men and 47.08% had history of smoking (75% of the smokers were men). At the time of index PCI, smokers were significantly younger than nonsmokers. Also, MACE were significantly higher in smokers than nonsmokers, which was particularly pronounced at the long-term interval. In the nonsmokers group, there was no difference in MACE occurrence between men and women. However, of the smokers, women showed significantly higher MACE rate compared with men peers. Conclusion. Smoking makes women more prone to MACE in comparison to men among patients with stable CAD after PCI with drug-eluting stent.

1. Introduction

Coronary artery disease (CAD) has become the pre-dominant cause of mortality and morbidity throughout the world [1]. Some investigations reported that the occurrence of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) is more common in women [2] and cardiovascular ischemia is one of the primary contributors to illness and lethality in this gender [3]. Meanwhile, smoking has been considered as an established risk factor for CAD [4]. The risk of MI in women was reported to be twofold higher compared with men due to smoking [3]. Also, women were shown to be at 25% greater risk for CAD than men with the same smoking degree [5].

Smoking augmented the incidence of adverse events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) [6, 7]. Reviewing the literature, limited data is available on comparison of clinical events between men and women after revascularization. The objective of our study is to investigate the association of gender with post-PCI major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in three time intervals in patients with history of smoking.

2. Materials and Methods

Between 2003 and 2019, patients who had PCI (index PCI) in two hospitals were considered. Inclusion criteria were elective PCI, i.e., patients with stable CAD. Patients who had PCI due to acute MI (primary PCI) and those with multiple PCI in the past were excluded as well as lost-to-follow-up participants. If anatomy of the coronary arteries was suitable, PCI was performed. The criteria of doing angioplasty were based on ≥75% narrowing in left anterior descending artery, diagonal, left circumflex artery, obtuse marginal branches, right coronary artery, posterior descending artery, or posterior left ventricular branch. At the time of index PCI, heparin (80–100 mg/kg) was administered. The preload of 600 mg clopidogrel and 325 mg aspirin (ASA) were given followed by 150 mg clopidogrel and 325 mg ASA for three weeks. It was continued by 75 mg/day clopidogrel and 80 mg ASA (160 mg in diabetics) in all the patients at least for two years. In addition, atorvastatin (40–80 mg daily) was given to all the patients. Drug-eluting stent (DES) from first generation (Sirolimus Eluting Stent, SES; Paclitaxel Eluting Stent, PES) and second generation (Zotarolimus Eluting Stent, ZES; Everolimus Eluting Stent, EES) was used in all of the participants, based on their availability.

History of smoking is defined as being a smoker of any amount of any type (cigarette, water pipe, cigar, and pipe) before index PCI. Patients were considered hyperlipidemic if they had hyperlipidemia (HLP) or used antihyperlipidemic medications [8]. Patients who had fasting plasma glucose of ≥126 mg/dL (7.0 mmol/L) or 2 h plasma glucose of ≥200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L) during oral glucose tolerance test or A1C of ≥6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or with classic symptoms of hyperglycemia or hyperglycemic crisis, a random plasma glucose of ≥200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L), or receiving antihyperglycemic medications before index PCI were considered as having diabetes mellitus (DM). Patients who had systolic blood pressure of ≥130 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure of ≥80 mmHg or both or receiving antihypertensive medications before index PCI were considered as having hypertension (HTN) [9].

Occurrence of MACE (coronary death, myocardial infarction (MI), and revascularization including PCI or coronary artery bypass grafting) was sought in the follow-up phase. During hospitalization, data regarding incidence of MACE could be easily collected. Upon discharge, the patients were asked to adhere to a periodic visiting schedule at defined clinic. Otherwise, phone calls were made looking for incidence of MACE. MACE was categorized with respect to the time of index PCI into three intervals. First 24 hours following the index PCI was considered short-term, between 24 hours and less than 6 months and equal to or more than 6 months were defined as mid- and long-term, respectively. Age means the age of the patients at the time of index PCI. Time-to-event is the time duration from index PCI to the incidence of first MACE.

Categorical and continuous variables are presented as number (%) and mean ± standard deviation (SD), respectively. Statistical tests (chi-square, independent sample t-test, and cox proportional-hazards regression) were used for analyses with value of less than 0.05 showing significant difference. All the analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 22.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

3. Results

The mean age of the participants at the time of index PCI was 60.14 ± 11.21 years. Women were older (62.38 ± 10.34) than men (58.72 ± 11.51) (). Among men, smokers were younger (56.82 ± 11.27) than nonsmokers (61.30 ± 11.32) () while there was no difference between smokers (61.34 ± 11.00) and nonsmokers (62.84 ± 10.01) in women (). Men to women ratio was 1.55. Minimum and maximum clinical follow-up duration were 10 days and 201.47 months with a median of 66.5 ± 10.66 months. Minimum and maximum time-to-event were 15 days and 150.6 months with a median of 51.47 ± 44.80 months.

Baseline characteristics of the population stratified by smoking status are demonstrated in Table 1. In total, 47.08% of the subjects were smokers with dominance of men (nearly 75%). Smokers were significantly younger (57.95 ± 11.37) than nonsmokers (60.08 ± 10.70) at the time of index PCI. Unlike HTN that was higher in the nonsmokers, the prevalence of DM and HLP was not different between smokers and nonsmokers. MACE incidence was significantly higher in smokers after nonsmoker peers (). No difference was seen in time-to-event between smoker and nonsmoker patients. Also, there were no significant differences regarding type of MACE (death, MI, and target vessel revascularization) between smoker (28.8%, 6%, 65%) and nonsmoker (18%, 6%, 76%) groups.

MACE incidence was 7.2% (130 patients) with no difference between men and women patients (Table 2). Comparing the two groups (MACE and not-MACE) showed that smokers were significantly outnumbered in the MACE group while other variables including age at the time of index PCI, gender, DM, HTN, and HLP were not different.

In Table 3, joint effect of smoking with gender and other risk factors on the incidence of MACE was delineated. When we added the effect of smoking to the effect of female gender, MACE incidence was statistically increased. Neither male gender nor other risk factors changed MACE significantly when combined with smoking. Hazard rate for interaction of gender and smoking is shown in Figure 1. It shows that, after adjusting other variables (age, DM, HTN, and HLP), smoker women were at a higher risk for MACE incidence compared with smoker men. We compared the incidence of MACE in short, mid-, and long term (Table 4). None of the participants experienced MACE in short-term interval. Of the 33 MACEs in mid-term, 22 occurred in smoker group which was significantly higher than the nonsmokers (). The remaining 97 MACEs (74.61%) happened in the long-term interval with 58 of them in smokers (significantly higher compared with nonsmokers, ). Table 4 also demonstrates that MACE incidence was statistically higher in smoker women in comparison to nonsmoker peers in both mid- and long-term intervals. Indeed, it seems that smoking significantly increased MACE in women compared with men at long-term interval as well as in total duration of follow-up period.

4. Discussion

The main findings that resonate from the present study are as follows. (1) About half of the CAD patients who underwent elective PCI had history of smoking. (2) Smokers were younger at the time of index PCI than nonsmokers. (3) Smoking was a stronger predictor of MACE than age, gender, DM, HTN, and HLP. (4) Smoker women were significantly more prone to MACE incidence than nonsmoker women while no difference was observed between smoker and nonsmoker men in this regard. Although nearly 75% of the smokers were men, MACE incidence was significantly higher in the smoker women.

There are debates in the pathophysiology of cardiovascular consequences of smoking [10–14]. Smoking promotes the generation of free radicals through increasing the oxidative stress and decreasing the protecting nitric oxide [15, 16]. These changes tip the cellular balance towards a pro-atherogenic and pro-thrombotic milieu. Also, smoking induces vasomotor dysfunction followed by impairment in lipid homeostasis and thereby facilitates the progression of inflammation at vascular and systemic scales [11].

Free radical-mediated oxidative stress is known as the pivotal reason for the development of atherosclerosis especially in women [17]. During menopause, hormonal changes lead to cholesterol oxidation, which provides a substrate for atherosclerosis development. Also, smoking instigates severe stress responses in the female gender [18]. The greater risk for coronary heart disease in women than men is possibly attributed to higher absorption of toxic chemicals in women as well [19].

Smoking induces platelet hyperactivity reducing the responsiveness of antiplatelet drugs like aspirin in patients with stable CAD [20]. A prospective cohort study stated that epigenetic alterations like the degree of methylation in a gene locus was associated with mortality in a population of stable CAD [21]. This gene locus expresses a protein with roles in platelet activation, intimal hyperplasia, and inflammation [22]. Smoking habit changes the methylation level [21].

Active smoking was shown to be in a consistent association with poor outcomes among patients with stable CAD [23]. Even light smokers experienced more cardiovascular and all-cause mortality compared with nonsmokers in such patients [24–26]. Cardiovascular risk factors are also severe in the former smokers, albeit lower than active peers [23]. This shows that smoking imposes harmful effects at any level. One important point that should be interpreted with caution is that, unlike some cardiovascular risk factors such as DM, HTN, and HLP that retain their deleterious effects until diagnosis and treatment, smoking is completely an extrinsic factor and its harms depend on the duration of smoking [27].

In an investigation, smoking was characterized as the only risk factor for MACE in long-term clinical follow-up, which is in line with the findings of the present study. However, association of history of smoking with mortality was ruled out in the other study [28]. Although the prevalence of smoking has been reported to be five times higher in men compared with women [29], the risk of MI due to smoking in men is half that of women [30]. Indeed, the prevalence of other CAD risk factors such as HTN and DM was lower in women, but in-hospital mortality and MACE were reported high in this gender, even irrespective of smoking status (current or former) [28]. Another possible explanation is that CAD is often underdiagnosed or misdiagnosed in women and hence they present at later stages with probably a more complicated condition. To substantiate, smoker women with 25% greater risk for coronary heart disease lose more years of life than smoker men [31].

A conflicting belief that was reported in seminal studies claim that smoking is associated with a lower rate of subsequent targeted lesion revascularization in patients with PCI. This so-called smoker’s paradox means there is no superiority of being nonsmoker with respect to the incidence of adverse events in CAD patients [8, 32, 33]. MACE incidence was nearly double in the smoker group compared with nonsmoker peers in our study reinforcing imperfection of the smoker’s paradox theory once more.

Data on clinical outcomes after revascularization were scarce especially considering gender differences [34, 35]. The majority of studies discussed the effect of smoking on the incidence of outcomes in PCI setting, but they did not consider the used stents at all or they considered bare metal stents only. Therefore, there is a need to provide insights from the area of PCI with DES stratified by gender. In our population of stable CAD with DES implantation during PCI, elevated occurrence of MACE in the smoker women compared with all other groups was evidenced in our study. This is in line with other findings stating that the female gender possesses a significant contribution to adverse cardiovascular events [36]. The advantages of our study were high number of participants and long period of follow-up (median of 66.5 ± 10.66 months).

Among the limitations of the study is that the menstrual cycle of women patients was not recorded. Phases of the menstrual cycle affect the incidence of cardiovascular-related events. However, as the median age of the women was about 62 years, it is anticipated that all of them were in the menopause phase. Evaluation of the smoking status of the participants was done in a self-reporting context. This may lead to some inaccuracies in terms of desire to be nonsmoker. Also, some participants may have changed smoking habit in the follow-up phase especially after the occurrence of a clinical event.

5. Conclusion

In patients with stable CAD, smokers suffered more MACE than nonsmokers in the post-PCI setting. Although the number of men was higher and smoking was more prevalent in this gender, women experienced more MACE. This shows the much more vulnerability of women due to smoking.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

A. N. Nowbar, M. Gitto, J. P. Howard, D. P. Francis, and R. Al-Lamee, “Mortality from ischemic heart disease: analysis of data from the world health organization and coronary artery disease risk factors from NCD risk factor collaboration,” Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, vol. 12, no. 6, Article ID e005375, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Appelman, B. B. Van Rijn, M. E. Ten Haaf, E. Boersma, and S. A. E. Peters, “Sex differences in cardiovascular risk factors and disease prevention,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 241, no. 1, pp. 211–218, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. K. Mehta, J. Wei, and N. K. Wenger, “Ischemic heart disease in women: a focus on risk factors,” Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 140–151, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. S. Duncan, M. S. Freiberg, R. A. Greevy, S. Kundu, R. S. Vasan, and H. A. Tindle, “Association of smoking cessation with subsequent risk of cardiovascular disease,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 322, no. 7, pp. 642–650, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Thomas, “Risque cardiovasculaire du tabagisme selon le genre,” La Presse Médicale., vol. 46, no. 7-8, pp. 681–687, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
U. K. Allahwala, J. C. Murphy, G. I. C. Nelson, and R. Bhindi, “Absence of a ‘smoker’s paradox’ in field triaged ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention,” Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 213–217, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Mohamedali and A. Shroff, “Impact of smoking status on cardiovascular outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention,” Clinical Cardiology, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 372–377, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. H. Nelson, “Hyperlipidemia as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease,” Primary Care: Clinics in Office Practice, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 195–211, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. J. Zibaeenezhad, S. S. Mohammadi, M. Sayadi, S. Khorshidi, E. Bahramali, and I. Razeghian-Jahromi, “The impact of diabetes mellitus and hypertension on clinical outcomes in a population of Iranian patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention: a retrospective cohort study,” The Journal of Clinical Hypertension, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 1647–1653, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Gennaro, S. J. Brener, B. Redfors et al., “Effect of smoking on infarct size and major adverse cardiac events in patients with large anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction (from the INFUSE-AMI trial),” The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 118, no. 8, pp. 1097–1104, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Ambrose and R. S. Barua, “The pathophysiology of cigarette smoking and cardiovascular disease,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 43, no. 10, pp. 1731–1737, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Motterlini and L. E. Otterbein, “The therapeutic potential of carbon monoxide,” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 728–743, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Ghosh, J. Gal, and N. Marczin, “Carbon monoxide: endogenous mediator, potential diagnostic and therapeutic target,” Annals of Medicine, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Symons, P. G. Masci, M. Francone et al., “Impact of active smoking on myocardial infarction severity in reperfused ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: the smoker’s paradox revisited,” European Heart Journal, vol. 37, no. 36, pp. 2756–2764, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
U. Garbin, A. F. Pasini, C. Stranieri, M. Cominacini, A. Pasini, and S. Manfro, “Cigarette smoking blocks the protective expression of Nrf2/ARE pathway in peripheral mononuclear cells of young heavy smokers favouring inflammation,” PLoS One, vol. 4, no. 12, Article ID e8225, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Messner and D. Bernhard, “Smoking and cardiovascular disease,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 509–515, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Vassalle, R. Sciarrino, S. Bianchi, D. Battaglia, A. Mercuri, and S. Maffei, “Sex-related differences in association of oxidative stress status with coronary artery disease,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 414–419, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. E. Back, A. E. Waldrop, M. E. Saladin et al., “Effects of gender and cigarette smoking on reactivity to psychological and pharmacological stress provocation,” Psychoneuroendocrinology, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 560–568, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Woodward, H. Tunstall-Pedoe, W. C. S. Smith, and R. Tavendale, “Smoking characteristics and inhalation biochemistry in the Scottish population,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 44, no. 12, pp. 1405–1410, 1991.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Addad, T. Chakroune, A. Asma et al., “Clopidogrel but not Aspirin prevents acute smoking-induced platelet aggregation in patients with stable coronary artery disease,” Thrombosis Research, vol. 123, no. 4, pp. 640–643, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. P. Breitling, K. Salzmann, D. Rothenbacher, B. Burwinkel, and H. Brenner, “Smoking, F2RL3 methylation, and prognosis in stable coronary heart disease,” European Heart Journal, vol. 33, no. 22, pp. 2841–2848, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. J. Leger, L. Covic, and A. Kuliopulos, “Protease-activated receptors in cardiovascular diseases,” Circulation, vol. 114, no. 10, pp. 1070–1077, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Bouabdallaoui, N. Messas, N. Greenlaw et al., “Impact of smoking on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with stable coronary artery disease,” European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Critchley and B. Unal, “Health effects associated with smokeless tobacco: a systematic review,” Thorax, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 435–443, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. E. Schane, P. M. Ling, and S. A. Glantz, “Health effects of light and intermittent smoking,” Circulation, vol. 121, no. 13, pp. 1518–1522, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Hackshaw, J. K. Morris, S. Boniface, J.-L. Tang, and D. Milenković, “Low cigarette consumption and risk of coronary heart disease and stroke: meta-analysis of 141 cohort studies in 55 study reports,” British Medical Journal, vol. 360, Article ID j5855, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y.-J. Zhang, J. Iqbal, D. Van Klaveren et al., “Smoking is associated with adverse clinical outcomes in patients undergoing revascularization with PCI or CABG,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 65, no. 11, pp. 1107–1115, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. A. Jeong, M. H. Jeong, H. C. Jeong et al., “Impact of smoking on clinical outcomes in female patients with acute myocardial infarction,” Korean Circulation Journal, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 22–27, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. C. Hitchman and G. T. Fong, “Gender empowerment and female-to-male smoking prevalence ratios,” Bulletin of the World Health Organization, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 195–202, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Njølstad, E. Arnesen, and P. G. Lund-Larsen, “Smoking, serum lipids, blood pressure, and sex differences in myocardial infarction: a 12-year follow-up of the Finnmark study,” Circulation, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 450–456, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Prescott, M. Osler, P. K. Anderson et al., “Mortality in women and men in relation to smoking,” International Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 27–32, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. I. Barbash, J. Reiner, H. D. White et al., “Evaluation of paradoxic beneficial effects of smoking in patients receiving thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: mechanism of the “smoker’s paradox” from the GUSTO-I trial, with angiographic insights,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 1222–1229, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Andrikopoulos, D. J. Richter, P. E. Dilaveris, A. Pipilis, A. Zaharoulis, and J. E. Gialafos, “In-hospital mortality of habitual cigarette smokers after acute myocardial infarction. The “smoker’s paradox” in a countrywide study,” European Heart Journal, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 776–784, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. T. Nauta, J. W. Deckers, R. T. van Domburg, and K. M. Akkerhuis, “Sex-related trends in mortality in hospitalized men and women after myocardial infarction between 1985 and 2008,” Circulation, vol. 126, no. 18, pp. 2184–2189, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Shiraki and D. Saito, “Sex difference of in-hospital mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction,” Acta Medica Okayama, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 307–314, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Howe, A. Leidal, D. Montgomery, and E. Jackson, “Role of cigarette smoking and gender in acute coronary syndrome events,” The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 108, no. 10, pp. 1382–1386, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2021 Seyyed Saeed Mohammadi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies