Research Article

The Predictive Value of Baseline Target Lesion SYNTAX Score for No-Reflow during Urgent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Myocardial Infarction

Table 3

Univariable and multivariable analysis of the association between TL-SS and no-reflow.

TL-SS level, categorical/continuousNumber of patients with no-reflow (%)Unadjusted OR (95% CI)Unadjusted valueAdjusted OR (95% CI) (model 1)Adjusted p value (model 1)Adjusted OR (95% CI) (model 2)Adjusted value (model 2)

Low tertile (n = 155)1 (0.6%)ReferenceReferenceReference
Median tertile (n = 207)20 (9.7%)16.47 (2.64–147.76)0.0078.92 (1.08–73.55)0.0428.91 (1.11–71.78)0.040
High tertile (n = 166)32 (19.3%)36.78 (4.96–272.77)<0.00115.13 (1.92–119.09)0.01014.81 (1.91–114.78)0.010
Per 1 score1.14 (1.09–1.19)<0.0011.08 (1.03–1.14)0.0011.08 (1.03–1.13)0.001

Note. Covariates of model 1: TL-SS, age, EF, STEMI, LCX location, and reference vessel diameter. Covariates of model 2: TL-SS, age, EF, STEMI, LCX location, reference vessel diameter, balloon predilation, and thrombus aspiration. CI, confidence interval; EF, ejection fraction; LCX, left circumflex coronary artery; OR, odds ratio; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; STEMI, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; TL-SS, target lesion SYNTAX score.