Research Article
Comparison between the Right and Left Distal Radial Access for Patients Undergoing Coronary Procedures: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis
| | Right distal radial access (n = 91) | Left distal radial access (n = 91) | value |
| Primary endpoint | | | | DRA success | 88 (96.7%) | 88 (96.7%) | 1.0 |
| Secondary endpoints | | | | Access time, (sec), median (IQR) | 39 (25–60) | 50 (29–90) | 0.035 | Coronary procedural success after DRA | 88 (100%) | 88 (100%) | 1.0 | Procedural time, (min), median (IQR | 27 (15–40) | 25 (17–41) | 0.360 | Radial artery occlusion, n (%) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1.0 | Radial artery spasm, n (%) | 2 (2.2%) | 6 (6.6%) | 0.148 | Hematoma, n (%) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1.0 | DAP, (Gy.m2), median (IQR) | 32 (20–56.2) | 32 (19–46) | 0.472 | Fluoroscopy time, (min), median (IQR) | 4.4 (2.5–9.1) | 4.3 (2.4–7.5) | 0.251 | VAS patient comfort for access, mean (SD)) | 2.1 (0.3) | 2.3 (0.7) | 0.494 | VAS patient comfort for hemostasia, mean (SD) | 2.1 (0.2) | 2.1 (0.3) | 0.497 |
|
|
DRA, distal radial access, IQR, interquartile range; DAP, dose-area product; VAS, visual analog scale.
|