Research Article

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation with ACURATE neo: Results from the PROGRESS PVL Registry

Table 1

Procedural outcomes.

VariableITT population (N  = 500)

Total time from first puncture to time of transfemoral access site closure (min)56.7 ± 26.8 (499)
Total time from insertion of delivery system to removal of delivery system (min)10.2 ± 11.6 (491)
Valve size implanted
 S19.6% (98)
 M38.8% (194)
 L41.6% (208)
Balloon predilatation91.4% (457)
Postdilatation45.2% (226)
Correct positioning of a single valve in the proper location98.6% (493)
Procedural mortality0.2% (1)
Periprocedural myocardial infarction (≤72 h)0.8% (4)
Major vascular complications2.8% (14)
Life-threatening/disabling bleeding0.8% (4)
Valve-in-valve implant^0.8% (4/500)
Surgical aortic valve replacement0.0% (0/500)
Unplanned use of cardiopulmonary bypass0.0% (0/500)
Coronary obstruction requiring intervention0.0% (0/500)
Ventricular septal perforation0.0% (0/500)
Cardiac tamponade0.0% (0/500)
Endocarditis0.0% (0/500)
Valve embolization0.2% (1/500)
Valve thrombosis0.0% (0/500)

Data are % (n) or mean ± standard deviation (n). Two patients from the ITT population were not implanted with ACURATE neo. ACURATE neo valve lost contact with the annulus; patient was treated valve-in-valve with a nonstudy valve, experienced cardiogenic shock, and died the same day as the index procedure. Intra-procedural myocardial infarction, n = 2 (STEMI, n = 1; NSTEMI, n = 1).