The Coronary Angiography-Derived Index of Microcirculatory Resistance Predicts Left Ventricular Performance Recovery in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Table 4
Logistic regression analysis for the left ventricular recovery at 3 months.
Univariable
Odds ratio
95% CI
value
Age
1.018
0.983–1.055
0.316
Male
0.401
0.125–1.287
0.124
Hypertension
0.455
0.180–1.152
0.097
Diabetes
0.929
0.364–2.367
0.877
Hyperlipidemia
0.445
0.182–1.089
0.076
Current smoking
0.525
0.212–1.297
0.163
Cardiac function (Killip class)
0.975
0.578–1.645
0.926
Peak CK-MB
0.995
0.990–1.000
0.047
Multivessel disease
0.704
0.249–1.991
0.508
LAD as the culprit vessel
2.338
0.918–5.953
0.075
Post-PCI TIMI flow grade
2.229
0.384–12.923
0.372
cTFC
0.964
0.930–1.000
0.050
caFFR
0.016
0–16.669
0.243
caIMR
0.957
0.927–0.988
0.007
Multivariable
Odds ratio
95% CI
value
Male
0.254
0.066–0.979
0.047
LAD as the culprit vessel
3.605
1.230–10.567
0.019
caIMR
0.948
0.916–0.981
0.002
LAD, left anterior descending; TIMI, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction; cTFC, corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count; caFFR, coronary angiography-derived fractional flow reserve; caIMR, coronary angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance.
