Research Article
An Approach for Generating Weights Using the Pairwise Comparison Matrix
Table 11
Pairwise comparison matrices for three suppliers relative to subcriteria of C1 and their local weights.
| | Supplier | Supplier1 | Supplier 2 | Supplier 3 | EM weights | Model (8) |
| | A. Comparison of suppliers with respect to shipment quality (C11) (consistency ratio 0.0332) | | Supplier 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 0.637 | 6.066 | | Supplier 2 | 1/3 | 1 | 3 | 0.258 | 2.461 | | Supplier 3 | 1/5 | 1/3 | 1 | 0.105 | 1.000 |
| | B. Comparison of suppliers with respect to delivery (C12) (consistency ratio 0.0251) | | Supplier 1 | 1 | 1/5 | 1/6 | 0.081 | 1.000 | | Supplier 2 | 5 | 1 | 1/2 | 0.342 | 4.211 | | Supplier 3 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0.577 | 7.101 |
| | C. Comparison of suppliers with respect to cost (C13) (consistency ratio 0) | | Supplier 1 | 1 | 1/3 | 1/6 | 0.100 | 1.000 | | Supplier 2 | 3 | 1 | 1/2 | 0.300 | 3.000 | | Supplier 3 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0.600 | 6.000 |
|
|
