Research Article
An Approach for Generating Weights Using the Pairwise Comparison Matrix
Table 12
Pairwise comparison matrices for three suppliers relative to subcriteria of C2 and their local weights.
| | Supplier | Supplier 1 | Supplier 2 | Supplier 3 | EM weights | Model (8) |
| | A. Comparison of suppliers with respect to the number of employees (C21) (consistency ratio 0.0032) | | Supplier 1 | 1 | 1/3 | 1/5 | 0.109 | 1.000 | | Supplier 2 | 3 | 1 | 1/2 | 0.309 | 2.823 | | Supplier 3 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0.582 | 5.313 |
| | B. Comparison of suppliers with respect to organization structure (C22) (consistency ratio 0.0462) | | Supplier 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 0.691 | 7.526 | | Supplier 2 | 1/4 | 1 | 3 | 0.218 | 2.373 | | Supplier 3 | 1/6 | 1/3 | 1 | 0.091 | 1.000 |
| | C. Comparison of suppliers with respect to the number training (C23) (consistency ratio 0.0462) | | Supplier 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 0.691 | 7.526 | | Supplier 2 | 1/4 | 1 | 3 | 0.218 | 2.373 | | Supplier 3 | 1/6 | 1/3 | 1 | 0.091 | 1.000 |
| | D. Comparison of suppliers with respect to the number of technical staff (C24) (consistency ratio 0.0032) | | Supplier 1 | 1 | 1/3 | 2 | 0.230 | 1.882 | | Supplier 2 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 0.648 | 5.313 | | Supplier 3 | 1/2 | 1/5 | 1 | 0.122 | 1.000 |
|
|
