Research Article

Metasurface-Based Solar Absorption Prediction System Using Artificial Intelligence

Table 1

Summarization of literature review.

ReferencesYearMethodologyParameters/metricsMerits/limitation

Patel et al. [21]2022aGraphene and LSTMResonator and substrate thickness(i) Precisely predict absorption levels, shorten simulation time, and use fewer resources
(ii) Training takes more time and memory
(iii) High computation burden

Patel et al. [22]2022bSiO2 and regression modelsResonator thickness, SiO2 width, SiO2 height, and chemical potential of graphene(i) More than 0.99 prediction accuracy
(ii) It was unable to match complicated datasets accurately

Zhang et al. [23]2022Titanium and gallium arsenide metalAbsorber absorption efficiency(i) The building was effectively angle-insensitive and capable of maintaining strong absorption
(ii) Yet effective validation is not achieved in this research

Parmar et al. [24]2022CNN-regressionIncidence angle, substrate, and resonator thickness(i) Precision at a high level
(ii) Lack of spatial invariance with respect to the supplied data

Patel et al. [25]2022cGeneral regression neural networkDifferent structural parameters(i) Decreased simulation time and increased accuracy
(ii) It may be quite large, which would make calculation difficult. There is not a perfect way to make things better

Donda et al. [26]2021CNNAbsorption spectrum response and low frequency(i) It appeals to applications that need quick on-demand design
(ii) However, the performance of the model is very poor

Patel et al. [27]2022dPolynomial regression models and MgF2 substrateSubstrate and resonator thickness, thickness, needlepoint, and plus shape width(i) Ability to absorb with great accuracy
(ii) The probability of prediction error is higher than in other methods

Patel et al. [28]2022eKNN and Ge2Sb2Te5 (GST) substrateThickness: metasurface, substrate, and ground plane(i) Superior prediction accuracy
(ii) The prediction phase is very slow due to the higher amount of data